The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 會計學系 === 85 === This study examines the effects of accountability, financial incentives and cognitive style (operationalized as field independence) on accounting decision performance. Ninety-one accounting undergraduate students participat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ho, mei jen, 何美珍
Other Authors: Duh Rong-Ruey
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1996
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94918629384886910256
id ndltd-TW-085SCU00385013
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-085SCU003850132016-07-01T04:15:55Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94918629384886910256 The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions 解釋責任.財務誘因及場地獨立性與會計判斷之關係 Ho, mei jen 何美珍 碩士 東吳大學 會計學系 85 This study examines the effects of accountability, financial incentives and cognitive style (operationalized as field independence) on accounting decision performance. Ninety-one accounting undergraduate students participated in the experiment and were asked to solved two series of problems with each containing three problems. The three problems were embedded with three different decision rules. Using accountability, financial incentive?KVd cognitive style as three between-subjects independent variables and decision rule as the within-subjects independent variable to conduct the experiment yields the following results :(1)Taking the performance in the first series into account, accountability was significant for problems 1 and 3, but not in the expected direction. Financial incentives was significant for problem 2, but not in the predicted direction. Cognitive style was significant for problem 3, and in the expected direction.(2)Without the consideration of performance in the first series, accountability was significant for problems 1 and 2. Financial incentives was significant for problem 2, but not in the predicted direction.(3)Summing the performance across the three problems in the second series without considering the performance in the first series, both accountability and financial incentives were significant, but again not in the predicted direction. The within-subject variable (decision rule) was significant. The within-subject variable (decision rule) was significant.(4)Summing the effort across the three problems in the second series, both accountability and financial incentives were significant and in the predicted direction. Possible explanations were offered. Duh Rong-Ruey 杜榮瑞 1996 學位論文 ; thesis 92 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 東吳大學 === 會計學系 === 85 === This study examines the effects of accountability, financial incentives and cognitive style (operationalized as field independence) on accounting decision performance. Ninety-one accounting undergraduate students participated in the experiment and were asked to solved two series of problems with each containing three problems. The three problems were embedded with three different decision rules. Using accountability, financial incentive?KVd cognitive style as three between-subjects independent variables and decision rule as the within-subjects independent variable to conduct the experiment yields the following results :(1)Taking the performance in the first series into account, accountability was significant for problems 1 and 3, but not in the expected direction. Financial incentives was significant for problem 2, but not in the predicted direction. Cognitive style was significant for problem 3, and in the expected direction.(2)Without the consideration of performance in the first series, accountability was significant for problems 1 and 2. Financial incentives was significant for problem 2, but not in the predicted direction.(3)Summing the performance across the three problems in the second series without considering the performance in the first series, both accountability and financial incentives were significant, but again not in the predicted direction. The within-subject variable (decision rule) was significant. The within-subject variable (decision rule) was significant.(4)Summing the effort across the three problems in the second series, both accountability and financial incentives were significant and in the predicted direction. Possible explanations were offered.
author2 Duh Rong-Ruey
author_facet Duh Rong-Ruey
Ho, mei jen
何美珍
author Ho, mei jen
何美珍
spellingShingle Ho, mei jen
何美珍
The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
author_sort Ho, mei jen
title The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
title_short The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
title_full The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
title_fullStr The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
title_full_unstemmed The effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
title_sort effects of accountability,financial incentives and cognitive style on accounting decisions
publishDate 1996
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94918629384886910256
work_keys_str_mv AT homeijen theeffectsofaccountabilityfinancialincentivesandcognitivestyleonaccountingdecisions
AT héměizhēn theeffectsofaccountabilityfinancialincentivesandcognitivestyleonaccountingdecisions
AT homeijen jiěshìzérèncáiwùyòuyīnjíchǎngdedúlìxìngyǔhuìjìpànduànzhīguānxì
AT héměizhēn jiěshìzérèncáiwùyòuyīnjíchǎngdedúlìxìngyǔhuìjìpànduànzhīguānxì
AT homeijen effectsofaccountabilityfinancialincentivesandcognitivestyleonaccountingdecisions
AT héměizhēn effectsofaccountabilityfinancialincentivesandcognitivestyleonaccountingdecisions
_version_ 1718330052308893696