Application of Chitosan in Treatment of Aquacultural Wastewater

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 食品科技研究所 === 85 === Acid-soluble and water-soluble chitosan prepared from commercial β-form chitin were utilized in coagulating aquacultural wastewater. The effects were estimated by analyzing some important water-quality parameters:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai, Han-Jung, 蔡漢蓉
Other Authors: Li Chin-Fung
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1997
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/19443170447051030319
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 食品科技研究所 === 85 === Acid-soluble and water-soluble chitosan prepared from commercial β-form chitin were utilized in coagulating aquacultural wastewater. The effects were estimated by analyzing some important water-quality parameters: turbidity, suspended solid (SS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonia- nitrogen, nitrite-nitrogen and fish pathogens (Aeromonas & Pseudomonas). On the acid-soluble chitosan test, closed-system cultural sewage was treated with chitosan coagulant with various degrees of deacetylation (DD) including DD 2.78 (chitin), 30.81, 48.73, 73.10, 86.19, combined with various concentrations- 0.1, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100 mg/ L wastewater. The range of optimum concentration for reducing turbidity and SS was very narrow, ca. 5~10 ppm. At the optimum concentration, cationic chitosan could destabilize negative colloidal suspensions by charge neutralization as well as subsequent formation of particle-polymer-particle bridge. In contrast, overdosage of chitosan would re-stabilize colloids/solids from the coagulated to suspended phase and made the condition worse instead of improving water quality, which occurred especially on more polycationic chitosan with higher degree of deacetylation. Because acetic acid and chitosan were both organic compounds, the COD and BOD value of treated wastewater widely rose. On the other hand, the BOD value in this study could not accurately stand for the content of organic compound due to the antimicrobial potential of chitosan and nitrification of aerobic microorganism. The addition of chitosan resulted in cations exchange between colloids and water, so the ammonia- nitrogen value would slightly increase. By forming ion pairs with chitosan, nitrite was kept from supernatant aliquots during colloids'' settling. In addition, the suspended chitosan-nitrite complex would decrease the active coefficient of nitrite due to electrostatic interaction. Above causes made the nitrite-nitrogen value slightly decreased. At the concentration of chitosan higher than 50 ppm, there was a high correlation between the ability of pathogen inhibition and the degree of deacetylation of chitosan; at 5~10 ppm chitosan, complete coagulation and sedimentation reduced more pathogens than using highly deacetylated chitosan. That was, with high addition of chitosan, the effect of pathogen inhibition depended on the degree of deacetylation of chitosan; when less chitosan was added, the effect of clarification was the key to determine the amount of survival pathogens. Effectiveness of treatment was evaluated for the acid- soluable chitosan solutions and they were stirred at room temperature for 2 or 14 days. The results indicated chitosan stirred for 14 days showed lower coagulating ability with higher turbidity than that for 2 days. The reason was probably due to degradation of chitosan by acetic acid which made it difficult to form bridge during coagulation. Finally, water-soluble chitosan with DD 68.31 and MW 3.88×106 was also used for the wastewater treatment. The results showed the tendencies of the effects to water-soluble chitosan were similar to those of acid-soluble one with different parameters of water quality. Furthermore, shaken by sonication might enhance expanded chitosan conformation and made it easier to form bridge to clarify wastewater than acid-soluble one did. To sum up, water- soluble chitosan possessed some advantages which acid- soluble one was short of: (1) the chitosan solution could be preserved for longer, and there was no fear for acid degradation, (2) avoiding to increase COD and BOD value by acetic acid as solvent, (3) to avoid fish-like odor. Therefore, except for the concern of cost, water-soluble chitosan was superior to acid-soluble one for improving water quality.