Epidemiological Study on Senile Cataract in Taiwan

博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 公共衛生學系 === 85 === In Taiwan, cataracts are very common among the elderly but its epi-demiologic studies are rare. In order to have our own research on cataract, a valid,reproducible, and easily- used cataract classification sys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: See, Lai-Chu, 史麗珠
Other Authors: Chen Chien-Jen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1997
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65570882500730323404
Description
Summary:博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 公共衛生學系 === 85 === In Taiwan, cataracts are very common among the elderly but its epi-demiologic studies are rare. In order to have our own research on cataract, a valid,reproducible, and easily- used cataract classification system is essential.Hence, the very first session of the study was to assess the reliability of theLens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III). Three raters(ophthalmologists with 10-15 years of practice) examined 30 patients (60 eyes)and graded their lens opacities independently accordi ng to LOCS III. Highinter- rater reliability (ICC: Intra-class coefficient between.75 and.89) wasobtained on photographic grading. Lower grading with clinical scores (.5 lower)was observed compared with the photographic grading for the same rater. Thephotographic variation was considered to be partially contributory to thisdifference. Although photographic records are ideal for a longitudinal study,clinical grading should not be omitted and is superior to the photographicgrading. Our results also in dicated that raters tended to give the same scoresfor nuclear opacities and color. We postulate that this phenomena may be due tothe fact that LOCS III puts nuclear opacities and color in the same frame.Separate pictures are recommended to avoid this problem. The second session of the study was to conduct a survey in Fushing Townshipof Taoyuan. Type-specific prevalence was aimed. Ethnic difference (aboriginesvs. non- aborigines) in cataract prevalence was examined. In 1995 and 1996, atotal of 180 residents were recruited for this study. Lens Opacities System III(LOCS III) was used to classify cataracts. The overall prior cataract surgeryrate was 13.9% with a significant increase with age (p<.0001). In thoseindividuals with significant lens opacities , bilateral was more commonly seenthan unilateral. Similar proportions of nuclear (NU) alone (6.1%), cortical (CO)alone (7.3%), NU + CO combined (7.3%), or all 3 (9.7%) were found in the sample. Posterior subcapsular cataract opacities (PSC) alone (1.2%) and CO + PSCcombined (1.2%) were less common while NU + PSC combined was not seen. Theprevalence of NU, CO, and PSC was 23.2%, 25.6% and 12.2%, respectively. Significant gender difference was seen in the NU group (p=.0358) but not in theCO or PSC types . The overall prevalence of lens opacities, plus a bestcorrected visual acuity (BVA) <=0.4, or plus a BVA <=0.1 were 32.9%, 13.4%, or9.8%, respectively. Adding those patients who had prior cataract surgery, theoverall prevalence increased another 10%. No difference in any lens opacitiesand visual impaired cataract was seen between aborigines and non-aborigines. Adose response relationship between sunlight exposure and age-and sex- adjustedcataract rate was observed, but the association was not statisti callysignificant. The third session of the study was to examine arsenic effect on cataract,which never been investigated, using a cohort with a high exposure to ingestedinorganic arsenic. In 1996, a total of 349 residents were studied in this study.Lens Opacities System III (LOCS III) was used to classify form of cataract. Theoverall cataract surgery rate was 10% for the group aged 50+, and increasedsignificantly with age (p<.0001). Cortical opacities (CO) (35%) was the mostcommon type, while nuclear (NU) and p osterior subcapsular (PSC) opacities wereseen in one-forth of the sample, respectively. There was no gender difference inNU, CO, and PSC. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was a significant risk for cataract, NU,CO, and PSC. Occupational sunlight exposure was positively associated with CO,showing multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 2.4 (95% CI=1.1-5.2) and 3.4(95% CI=1.3-8.7) for individuals with 20-40 and >40 years of occupation sunlightexposure, respectively. Cumulative arsenic exposure shows a dose-resp onserelationship with prevalence of PSC. Multivariate-adjusted ORs were 4.8 (95%CI=1.03-22.2) and 5.7 (95% CI=1.2-26.3) for those with cumulative arsenicexposures of 12.1-20 and >20 mg/L-years, respectively. Although there are only several studies which use the blood data toinvestigate an association between selenium and cataract in humans, theirresults are controversial. The fourth session of the study to use a veryhomogeneous sample (narrow age range, healthy, from the same geographiclocation) to explore the relationship between blood selenium and cataract. In1996, a total of 74 study subjects (41 cases and 33 controls) were recruitedfrom an elderly club. Plasma selenium was measured by hydride atomic absorptionspectrometry. Cataract was defined based on the Lens Opacities ClassificationSystem III. Control subjects were slightly younger than case subjects. Othercharacteristics, including gender, cigarette smoking, use of alcohol, andoccupational sunlight exposure, were comparable between case and controlsubjects. Selenium level was categorized into three groups: low portion lessthan.115 (g/ml, middle portion between.115 and.135 (g/ml, and high portiongreater than.135 (g/ml. A U-shaped r elation was seen between plasma seleniumand overall cataract. Significantly high risk for overall cataract was seen inindividuals with the low portion than those with the middle portion of plasmaselenium (adjusted OR=3.22 with 95% CI=1.01-10.38). U-shaped relation was alsoseen in nuclear opacities (NU), cortical opacities (CO) and posteriorsubcapsular opacities (PSC), but only PSC shows statistical significance. TheORs of PSC were 4.70 (95% CI=1.16 - 19.05) and 4.57 (95% CI=1.05 - 19.94) forthe low a nd high portion as compared to the middle portion. After acomprehensive review on the relevant articles, we speculate that not taking theU-shaped relationship into account may be part of the reason of thecontroversial findings among these studies. Bigger sample size, selenium levelin other ocular tissue, nested case-control well help to clarify therelationship between selenium and cataract.