Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 數學系 === 85 === Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated by Cp method ( Mal...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
1997
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819 |
id |
ndltd-TW-085NCUE0479010 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-085NCUE04790102015-10-13T18:05:27Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819 Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion 拔靴法在ConfounderSelection上的應用 Hong, Jian-Xiang 洪建祥 碩士 國立彰化師範大學 數學系 85 Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated by Cp method ( Mallows, 1973) bootstrap procedure (Efron, 1982 ), and some modified bootstrap procedures (Shao, 1996 ). These methods may perform well in prediction. However, sometimes economists and epidemiologists are more interested in estimating and making inferences about the effect of certain risk factor. In this case, it is important to select the confounders of the risk factor into the model for controlling, rather than just to select the important covariates of the response. In this work, we propose a "best subset" criterion for confounder selection procedure by minimizing the mean squared error of the risk factor. This value is estimated by both bootstrap and naive methods. We compare the selection procedures based on these two methods with conventional Cp method by simulation. Lian Ie-Bin 連怡斌 1997 學位論文 ; thesis 42 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 數學系 === 85 === Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction
error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable
selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated
by Cp method ( Mallows, 1973) bootstrap procedure (Efron,
1982 ), and some modified bootstrap procedures (Shao, 1996 ).
These methods may perform well in prediction. However,
sometimes economists and epidemiologists are more interested
in estimating and making inferences about the effect of certain
risk factor. In this case, it is important to select the
confounders of the risk factor into the model for
controlling, rather than just to select the important
covariates of the response. In this work, we propose a "best
subset" criterion for confounder selection procedure by
minimizing the mean squared error of the risk factor. This
value is estimated by both bootstrap and naive methods. We
compare the selection procedures based on these two methods
with conventional Cp method by simulation.
|
author2 |
Lian Ie-Bin |
author_facet |
Lian Ie-Bin Hong, Jian-Xiang 洪建祥 |
author |
Hong, Jian-Xiang 洪建祥 |
spellingShingle |
Hong, Jian-Xiang 洪建祥 Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
author_sort |
Hong, Jian-Xiang |
title |
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
title_short |
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
title_full |
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
title_fullStr |
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion |
title_sort |
bootstrap on confounder seletion |
publishDate |
1997 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hongjianxiang bootstraponconfounderseletion AT hóngjiànxiáng bootstraponconfounderseletion AT hongjianxiang báxuēfǎzàiconfounderselectionshàngdeyīngyòng AT hóngjiànxiáng báxuēfǎzàiconfounderselectionshàngdeyīngyòng |
_version_ |
1718027721595944960 |