Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion

碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 數學系 === 85 === Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated by Cp method ( Mal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong, Jian-Xiang, 洪建祥
Other Authors: Lian Ie-Bin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1997
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819
id ndltd-TW-085NCUE0479010
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-085NCUE04790102015-10-13T18:05:27Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819 Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion 拔靴法在ConfounderSelection上的應用 Hong, Jian-Xiang 洪建祥 碩士 國立彰化師範大學 數學系 85 Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated by Cp method ( Mallows, 1973) bootstrap procedure (Efron, 1982 ), and some modified bootstrap procedures (Shao, 1996 ). These methods may perform well in prediction. However, sometimes economists and epidemiologists are more interested in estimating and making inferences about the effect of certain risk factor. In this case, it is important to select the confounders of the risk factor into the model for controlling, rather than just to select the important covariates of the response. In this work, we propose a "best subset" criterion for confounder selection procedure by minimizing the mean squared error of the risk factor. This value is estimated by both bootstrap and naive methods. We compare the selection procedures based on these two methods with conventional Cp method by simulation. Lian Ie-Bin 連怡斌 1997 學位論文 ; thesis 42 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 數學系 === 85 === Minimizing mean squared error ( MSE ) or expected prediction error ( PE) is a frequently used criterion for variable selection procedure in linear model. MSE or PE can be estimated by Cp method ( Mallows, 1973) bootstrap procedure (Efron, 1982 ), and some modified bootstrap procedures (Shao, 1996 ). These methods may perform well in prediction. However, sometimes economists and epidemiologists are more interested in estimating and making inferences about the effect of certain risk factor. In this case, it is important to select the confounders of the risk factor into the model for controlling, rather than just to select the important covariates of the response. In this work, we propose a "best subset" criterion for confounder selection procedure by minimizing the mean squared error of the risk factor. This value is estimated by both bootstrap and naive methods. We compare the selection procedures based on these two methods with conventional Cp method by simulation.
author2 Lian Ie-Bin
author_facet Lian Ie-Bin
Hong, Jian-Xiang
洪建祥
author Hong, Jian-Xiang
洪建祥
spellingShingle Hong, Jian-Xiang
洪建祥
Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
author_sort Hong, Jian-Xiang
title Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
title_short Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
title_full Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
title_fullStr Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
title_full_unstemmed Bootstrap On Confounder Seletion
title_sort bootstrap on confounder seletion
publishDate 1997
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/43381991455306475819
work_keys_str_mv AT hongjianxiang bootstraponconfounderseletion
AT hóngjiànxiáng bootstraponconfounderseletion
AT hongjianxiang báxuēfǎzàiconfounderselectionshàngdeyīngyòng
AT hóngjiànxiáng báxuēfǎzàiconfounderselectionshàngdeyīngyòng
_version_ 1718027721595944960