A Study of International Regime --An Example for Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 國際事務與戰略研究所 === 84 === International regimes are defined as principles, norms, rules, and decision - making procedures around which actor expectations converge in a given issue area. As a starting point, regimes have been conceptualized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai, Tseng-Jia, 蔡增家
Other Authors: Chang, Tai-Lin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1996
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01304560042144274185
Description
Summary:碩士 === 淡江大學 === 國際事務與戰略研究所 === 84 === International regimes are defined as principles, norms, rules, and decision - making procedures around which actor expectations converge in a given issue area. As a starting point, regimes have been conceptualized as intervening variables, standing between basic casual factors and related outcomes and behavior. Regimes are harder to establish in the security area than they are in the economic realm because of the inherently competitive cast of many security concerns, the unforgiving how much security the state has or needs. Nevertheless, there is at least one example of a functioning security regime -- Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. The study of regimes can begin from two approaches -- hegemonic stability theory and function theory. Hegemonic stability theory developed here accepts the realist image of international politics, in which hegemonic leader is a very important factor in an anarchic environment. Function theory stresses that cooperation among states create for regime''s continuance. Epistemic community, however, plays an ultimate role in the formation of regime. Current superpower relations should not be considereda regime because of the principles, rules, and norms have little autonomy but instead can be best understood as quiet direct reflections of states'' power and interests. This thesis addresses that two distinctive traditions have developed from structural realist perspectives. The first forcuses purely on interaction among states. The second focuses on the relationship between the distribution of power and various international environments it is the latter tradition that suggests why regimes may be important for a realist orientation. However, it also opens the possibility for viewing regimes as a utonomous, not just as intervening, variables. There may be lags between changes in basic casual variable and regime change. There may be feedback suggest an importancefor regimes that would be rejected by conventional structural arguments.