The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 俄羅斯研究所 === 84 === Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th centurywas an important part in the development of Russian foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Kuo-chang, 利國章
Other Authors: Chi Ming
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1996
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884
id ndltd-TW-084TKU00219006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-084TKU002190062015-10-13T17:49:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884 The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. 十九世紀中葉俄國的東進政策與璦琿條約之研究(1840∼1858年) Li, Kuo-chang 利國章 碩士 淡江大學 俄羅斯研究所 84 Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th centurywas an important part in the development of Russian foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It de-finitely would result in new interactions between China andRussia through the engagement, conflict, and compromise amongpolitical, econmic, and culture sectors. The purpose of this thesis is, based on the research of Russian "EastwardPolicy" and Ai Hun Treaty and focused on ensuing developmentof Sino-Russian border problems leaving behind NerchinskTreaty, to analyse the following: (1) What is the relationship between Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and its tradi- tional expansion policy? (2) How was the international situtation and the circum- stance chin Dunasty was in affecting Russia's "East- ward Policy?" (3) Whether the purpost of Russia's intruding into Amur region and its expansion achievement affected future development of Russian "Eastward Policy." (4) Using Ai Hun Treaty as a case to explain the negotia- tion process to settle Sino-Russian east border dis- pute and to study the effect of this treaty. (5) Analyse whether the signing of Ai Hun Treaty had legal effect and its controversy. The methodology of this thesis is based on historical des- cription. Using basic concepts of historicalism and pramaticism,and using the principle of a country's geographical positionaffects its power and foreign policy approach, and basing on available modern history materials, to re-examine this historicalproblem. The First Chapter serves as an introduction. TheSecond Chapter explains the formation of Russian "Eastward Policy." The Third Chapter discusses the implementation of Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and the controversy surrounding Sino-Russian east border. TheFourth Chapter deals with the signing of Ai Hun Treaty. TheFifth Chapter reviews and analyses Ai Hun Treaty. The SixthChapter concludes this thesis. Chi Ming 明驥 1996 學位論文 ; thesis 25 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 俄羅斯研究所 === 84 === Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th centurywas an important part in the development of Russian foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It de-finitely would result in new interactions between China andRussia through the engagement, conflict, and compromise amongpolitical, econmic, and culture sectors. The purpose of this thesis is, based on the research of Russian "EastwardPolicy" and Ai Hun Treaty and focused on ensuing developmentof Sino-Russian border problems leaving behind NerchinskTreaty, to analyse the following: (1) What is the relationship between Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and its tradi- tional expansion policy? (2) How was the international situtation and the circum- stance chin Dunasty was in affecting Russia's "East- ward Policy?" (3) Whether the purpost of Russia's intruding into Amur region and its expansion achievement affected future development of Russian "Eastward Policy." (4) Using Ai Hun Treaty as a case to explain the negotia- tion process to settle Sino-Russian east border dis- pute and to study the effect of this treaty. (5) Analyse whether the signing of Ai Hun Treaty had legal effect and its controversy. The methodology of this thesis is based on historical des- cription. Using basic concepts of historicalism and pramaticism,and using the principle of a country's geographical positionaffects its power and foreign policy approach, and basing on available modern history materials, to re-examine this historicalproblem. The First Chapter serves as an introduction. TheSecond Chapter explains the formation of Russian "Eastward Policy." The Third Chapter discusses the implementation of Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and the controversy surrounding Sino-Russian east border. TheFourth Chapter deals with the signing of Ai Hun Treaty. TheFifth Chapter reviews and analyses Ai Hun Treaty. The SixthChapter concludes this thesis.
author2 Chi Ming
author_facet Chi Ming
Li, Kuo-chang
利國章
author Li, Kuo-chang
利國章
spellingShingle Li, Kuo-chang
利國章
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
author_sort Li, Kuo-chang
title The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
title_short The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
title_full The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
title_fullStr The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
title_full_unstemmed The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
title_sort study of imperial russia's eastward policy and aigun treaty in the middle of 19th century.
publishDate 1996
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884
work_keys_str_mv AT likuochang thestudyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury
AT lìguózhāng thestudyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury
AT likuochang shíjiǔshìjìzhōngyèéguódedōngjìnzhèngcèyǔàihúntiáoyuēzhīyánjiū18401858nián
AT lìguózhāng shíjiǔshìjìzhōngyèéguódedōngjìnzhèngcèyǔàihúntiáoyuēzhīyánjiū18401858nián
AT likuochang studyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury
AT lìguózhāng studyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury
_version_ 1717785078897049600