The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century.
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 俄羅斯研究所 === 84 === Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th centurywas an important part in the development of Russian foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It d...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
1996
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884 |
id |
ndltd-TW-084TKU00219006 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-084TKU002190062015-10-13T17:49:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884 The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. 十九世紀中葉俄國的東進政策與璦琿條約之研究(1840∼1858年) Li, Kuo-chang 利國章 碩士 淡江大學 俄羅斯研究所 84 Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th centurywas an important part in the development of Russian foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It de-finitely would result in new interactions between China andRussia through the engagement, conflict, and compromise amongpolitical, econmic, and culture sectors. The purpose of this thesis is, based on the research of Russian "EastwardPolicy" and Ai Hun Treaty and focused on ensuing developmentof Sino-Russian border problems leaving behind NerchinskTreaty, to analyse the following: (1) What is the relationship between Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and its tradi- tional expansion policy? (2) How was the international situtation and the circum- stance chin Dunasty was in affecting Russia's "East- ward Policy?" (3) Whether the purpost of Russia's intruding into Amur region and its expansion achievement affected future development of Russian "Eastward Policy." (4) Using Ai Hun Treaty as a case to explain the negotia- tion process to settle Sino-Russian east border dis- pute and to study the effect of this treaty. (5) Analyse whether the signing of Ai Hun Treaty had legal effect and its controversy. The methodology of this thesis is based on historical des- cription. Using basic concepts of historicalism and pramaticism,and using the principle of a country's geographical positionaffects its power and foreign policy approach, and basing on available modern history materials, to re-examine this historicalproblem. The First Chapter serves as an introduction. TheSecond Chapter explains the formation of Russian "Eastward Policy." The Third Chapter discusses the implementation of Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th century and the controversy surrounding Sino-Russian east border. TheFourth Chapter deals with the signing of Ai Hun Treaty. TheFifth Chapter reviews and analyses Ai Hun Treaty. The SixthChapter concludes this thesis. Chi Ming 明驥 1996 學位論文 ; thesis 25 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 俄羅斯研究所 === 84 === Abstract: Russian "Eastward Policy" in the middle of 19th
centurywas an important part in the development of Russian
foreignpolicy. By the implementation of "Eastward Policy," It
de-finitely would result in new interactions between China
andRussia through the engagement, conflict, and compromise
amongpolitical, econmic, and culture sectors. The purpose of
this thesis is, based on the research of Russian
"EastwardPolicy" and Ai Hun Treaty and focused on ensuing
developmentof Sino-Russian border problems leaving behind
NerchinskTreaty, to analyse the following: (1) What is the
relationship between Russian "Eastward Policy" in the
middle of 19th century and its tradi- tional expansion
policy? (2) How was the international situtation and the
circum- stance chin Dunasty was in affecting Russia's
"East- ward Policy?" (3) Whether the purpost of
Russia's intruding into Amur region and its expansion
achievement affected future development of Russian
"Eastward Policy." (4) Using Ai Hun Treaty as a case to
explain the negotia- tion process to settle Sino-Russian
east border dis- pute and to study the effect of this
treaty. (5) Analyse whether the signing of Ai Hun Treaty had
legal effect and its controversy. The methodology of
this thesis is based on historical des- cription. Using
basic concepts of historicalism and pramaticism,and using the
principle of a country's geographical positionaffects its power
and foreign policy approach, and basing on available modern
history materials, to re-examine this historicalproblem. The
First Chapter serves as an introduction. TheSecond Chapter
explains the formation of Russian "Eastward Policy." The Third
Chapter discusses the implementation of Russian "Eastward
Policy" in the middle of 19th century and the controversy
surrounding Sino-Russian east border. TheFourth Chapter deals
with the signing of Ai Hun Treaty. TheFifth Chapter reviews and
analyses Ai Hun Treaty. The SixthChapter concludes this thesis.
|
author2 |
Chi Ming |
author_facet |
Chi Ming Li, Kuo-chang 利國章 |
author |
Li, Kuo-chang 利國章 |
spellingShingle |
Li, Kuo-chang 利國章 The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
author_sort |
Li, Kuo-chang |
title |
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
title_short |
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
title_full |
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
title_fullStr |
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Study of Imperial Russia's Eastward Policy and Aigun Treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
title_sort |
study of imperial russia's eastward policy and aigun treaty in the middle of 19th century. |
publishDate |
1996 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73738678276088454884 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT likuochang thestudyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury AT lìguózhāng thestudyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury AT likuochang shíjiǔshìjìzhōngyèéguódedōngjìnzhèngcèyǔàihúntiáoyuēzhīyánjiū18401858nián AT lìguózhāng shíjiǔshìjìzhōngyèéguódedōngjìnzhèngcèyǔàihúntiáoyuēzhīyánjiū18401858nián AT likuochang studyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury AT lìguózhāng studyofimperialrussiaseastwardpolicyandaiguntreatyinthemiddleof19thcentury |
_version_ |
1717785078897049600 |