| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 心理學系 === 84 === There are two major political parties that play important roles
in the scene of Taiwan politics. The KMT have government Taiwan
area over fifty years, which came from mainland China. Being a
minority group as opposed to the KMT, the natures of the DPP
supporters are not as same as the members of the KMT. Their
ancestors have lived in Taiwan for hundreds of years.
Consequently, the ethno identity and the political identity are
confused with each other for most of the people in Taiwan.
Someone would choose suort one political group not because their
cognition to politics, but because most their ethno background.
It is to say, one whose fathers came from mainland china would
mostly support the KMT than the DPP. One whose fathers were
birth in Taiwan is mostly support the DPP than the KMT.The
purpose of research is to find out the difference of ideology
between two political groups. Besides I will utilize the real-
life intergroup relationship for proving in-group bias. Two
methods of research were adopted. One is historical research,
and the other is an experimental method. The results reveal that
there were different ideology in two groups. The KMT supporters
usually have more conservative attitudes about politics. The DPP
supporters have more open attitudes with their opinions. The
ethno backgrounds usually display the role of accentuation. On
the other hand, The in-group bias phenomenon has been partly
proved. It means that there is a vivid in-group bias phenomenon
in minority group. Someone who supports the DPPave a higher
rating with the statement that talked by the DPP member. The
conclusion of the research also reveals something. There were
two opposed opinions rising to explain someone''s identification
for their sense of belonging. What opinions someone may choose
are usually decided by their political identity. One who
supports the KMT choose more likely the opinion "Taiwanese is
also a Chinese." One who supports the DPP accept more likely the
opinion "Taiwanese is just a Taiwanese." Because the two
opinionsre abstract definition, so they are not decided by
someone''s descent. That is to say the traditional manners of
ethno category by dialect are broken. The new manner of ethno
category is not imposed by someone''s descent. I am not
optimistic about the phenomenon. The rise of the new ethno
definition does not only completely displace the old system of
category but also confused with each other. It must have the
Taiwan people divided into more small groups. So I predict in
the future, The ethno identity of Taiw people would be more
complicated .
|
|---|
