Crisis and Life-World: Reaserch of Husserl''s later Philosophy

• Main Authors: Chen, Jie Ming, 陳潔明
• Other Authors: Wu, Kun Ru
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 1995
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/96466178632843616679

博士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 哲學研究所 === 83 === There is a controversy in Husserl''s later Philosophy, that is,does his last work "Crisis" contain any change of his philosophical position? Or put in another way, does he retreat from transcendental phenomenology in this work? How should we read "Crisis", not only what he said in this book but also what he really thougth in his mind. It is a easy thing to see that in Crisis Husserl no longer propose his phenomenoloyg as a study of pure consciousness or as a egology, in stead of that, Husserl give us another idea as to what does phenomenlogy ought to be, that is, a science of life-world. Was it a real theoratical change, or just a literal change? That is the question this thesis want to answer. As a result of careful study, this thesis maintain that, first, the writing of Crisis was a reaction of the impact of the philosophical movement of scientific philosophy, and that is also true to the proper configuration of phenomenology. Second, what Crisis said, as to the subjective intention of Husserl himself, did not change the propsal of a regirous science, and it should back to the explication of transcental subjectivity. As to this concern, the concept of life-world is but a media bewteen sciences of natural attitude and transcendental phenomenology as a foundemental science, when Husserl guide the readers to get aquaintance of the way of phenomenoloyg. But in spite of the same intention of Husserl, there did containd some theoratical changes in the new introduction way. In this thesis, I give those points mention above a regirous analysis.