Evaluation of three different analytical methods on detectingidues in milk and a survey of sulfonamide residues in UHT milkn Taiwan

碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 獸醫學系 === 83 === A rapid screening test of STH (Sulfathiazole), SMT (Sulfamethazine), and SDM (Sulfadimethoxine) residues in milk was made by employing a CSTTK (CITE Sulfa Trio test kit) of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in this study....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chai-i Yeh, 葉潔怡
Other Authors: Chung-Liang YOUNG,Tung-Ching CHUNG
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1995
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67794197311865775025
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 獸醫學系 === 83 === A rapid screening test of STH (Sulfathiazole), SMT (Sulfamethazine), and SDM (Sulfadimethoxine) residues in milk was made by employing a CSTTK (CITE Sulfa Trio test kit) of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in this study. Advantages of CSTTK assay was found to include: (1) pretreatment of milk sample was not required, (2) result could be obtained within 7 minutes, and (3) minimum detectable concentration for each sulfonamide was as low as 10 ppb. With regard to TLC analysis, the use of By employing the developed screening test (CSTTK and TLC analysis) and quantitative test (HPLC analysis), a survey was made on 213 marketed UHT milk samples of 12 brands collected from August, 1994 to April, 1995. A high violation rate was thus seen reaching approximately 30% (64/213). Among these illegal samples, the appearance rates of sulfonamide residue were SMT, 81.25% (52/64); SMM, 31.2% (20/64); SDM, 17.1% (11/64); and STH, 1.5% (1/64) respectively and concentrations detected were all Contamination of tested milk samples by sulfonamide were more severe in summer than in winter. The summer uncertified rate in market milk, tank milk were 57.1%, 16.3%, respectively. The winter uncertified rate in market milk, tank milk were 16.5%, 7.5%, respectively.