Carrots Grading with Image Processing and Neural Network

碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 農業機械工程學系 === 83 === The purpose of the thesis is to combine vision processing techniques with neural network to establish a grading system of carrots. The system used modified moment to characterize carrot contour and used classifier to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ying-Jen Huang, 黃膺任
Other Authors: Fang-Fan Lee
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1995
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90788311176664087096
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立中興大學 === 農業機械工程學系 === 83 === The purpose of the thesis is to combine vision processing techniques with neural network to establish a grading system of carrots. The system used modified moment to characterize carrot contour and used classifier to identify forked carrot. Then the ystem utilized the cross-gradient operator and the 4-connectivity labeling method to detect cracks. Those carrots which were not forked or cracked were further graded into three classes. In the grading processes, the crack-following method was employed to find the contour pixels and the Hotelling transform method was used to obtain the major axis. Then, the symmetry, diameter difference, curvature, and compactness of the carrot image were acquired according to the relationships between the major axis and the contour. The green area of the carrot image was calculated by adding all the green pixels of the image. Whether a pixel was classified as green or red was based on the chromaticity diagram. The size of the green area was used as the color describing factor. A three-layer error back-propagation neural network employing the shape and color factors as the input parameters was used to simulate the manual grading of carrots. To search for the best grading model, the types and number of the input parameters and the number of the nodes of the hidden layer were changed. The result of this study revealed that the neural network grading system could identify forks approximately at 96%, cracks at 92% and the grading accuracy at 81% in comparison with manual grading.