A STUDY ON THE U.N. MEMBERSHIPS OF FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLICS

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所 === 82 === Three main points are discussed in this thesis: 1.How did U.N. deal with the membership of the former SFRY? The Security Council, in its Resolution 777 of September 19,1992,"considered "that "...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen,Yung-Chang, 陳永昌
Other Authors: Dr.Tzou,Chong-Ko
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1994
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/37880474504234155426
Description
Summary:碩士 === 淡江大學 === 歐洲研究所 === 82 === Three main points are discussed in this thesis: 1.How did U.N. deal with the membership of the former SFRY? The Security Council, in its Resolution 777 of September 19,1992,"considered "that "the state formerly known as the Socialist Federal Republic of Yogoslavia has ceased to exist. " On September 22,1992,the General Assembly, in its Resolution 47/1,decided that"the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) cannot continue automatically the membership ".The compromise solution seems incompatible with the Charter provisions and past practice. 2.How did the Republic of Macedonia join U.N. by overcoming Greece's hindrance? Because of Greece's obstruction, Macedonia which met all traditional criteria for statehood was having its calls for recognition ignored.For validating its international personality, Skopje then decided to apply for the U.N. membership instead of recognition of the members of the international community. 3.Among former Yugoslav republics, why did the Republic of Bosnia and Hercegovina join U.N. so smoothly? In fact,there are serious racial problems in Bosnia and Hercegovina,The European countries and the United States intended to recognize Bosnia and Hercegovina as a means of averting the sort of violence in Croatia.However,the unanimous support for its U.N. membership couldn't restrain the war from amplifying. Conclusions: 1.Facing the increasing racial problems and regional conflicts,U.N.should establish the mechanism of "Preventive Diplomacy"for early intervention. 2.The European Union's involvement in Yogoslav crisis demostrated the limitation of the ongoing approach to carry out the "Common Foreign Policy". 3.The ROC's admission to U.N. cannot be reached merely by changing its de jure name or plebiscite.