| Summary: | 碩士 === 東海大學 === 哲學研究所 === 81 === Deconstruction is often regarded as purely nihilism, that is
because we barely realize the profound meaning of critique of
Western culture which it has, thus arised such a
misunderstanding . This dissertation, on the one hand, aims to
clarify the rela- tion between later Heidegger and Derrida; on
the other hand, to deal with the debate about hermeneutics and
deconstruction by way of later Heidegger''s viewpoint of
language. "Language is the house of Being." ── Heidegger''s
famous word── marks the privilege of language and the
critique of traditional conception of subject. From the
standpoint, decons- truction and philosophical hermeneutics
take their own processive development,especially grmmatalogy
founded by Derrida can be seen as transformation of later
Heidegger in terms of time."language" thus has become the
problematic. Our theses are as follows: First,along with
rethinking the lost experience of Being from language by
Heidegger, we will try to show how the movement of " archi-
writing" can be possible under the dominance of the meta-
physics of presence. Second, under the influence of Heidegger,
Derrida supposed that the differential movement of language is
not wholly contro- able by conciousness, on the contrary,
consiousness have been open to subconciousness, even the
effects of it. Finally, we wish to clarify opposite
interpretations about Heidegger from Gadamer and Derrida.On the
basis of it, judging their own positions to explicate why the
former belongs to so called "the right Heideggerian", and the
latter "the left Heide- ggerian".
|
|---|
