A Comparison of Management Control System in Taiwanese Firms and American Subsidiaries in Taiwan
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 會計學研究所 === 81 === This study compares the management control systems of Taiw- anese firms to those of American subsidiaries in Taiwan, and u- sing Hofstede''s taxonomy of national cultural dimensions to an- alyze the difference...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
1993
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00100733424918070068 |
Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 會計學研究所 === 81 === This study compares the management control systems of Taiw-
anese firms to those of American subsidiaries in Taiwan, and u-
sing Hofstede''s taxonomy of national cultural dimensions to an-
alyze the differences. This study also considers the correlati-
ons among management control subsystems. Data were collected
from 69 managers of 12 computer/electr- onics firms in Taiwan.
Six of these firms were of Taiwanese or- igin, and the other
six were subsidiaries of U.S. firms. The f- indings were as
follows: (1) American subsidiaries in Taiwan had higher level
of us- ing participative budgeting than Taiwanese firms. (2)
American subsidiaries in Taiwan had higher level of us- ing
participative performance evaluation than Taiwanese firms. (3)
American subsidiaries in Taiwan had higher level of us- ing
controllability filter than Taiwanese firms. (4) American
subsidiaries in Taiwan had higher level of us- ing performance-
contingent rewards than Taiwanese firms. (5) Taiwanese firms
used tighter budgetary standard than A- merican subsidiaries.
Three of the findings[(1) to (3)] was consistent with the
expectations that different national culture led to different
management control systems. The findings also indicated that t-
hree of the correlations between management control system com-
ponents in American subsidiaries in Taiwan were significant:
(1) The correlation between performance-contingent rewards and
controllability filter was positive. (2) The correlation
between performance-contingent rewards and standard tightness
was positive. (3) The correlation between participative
performance eval- uation and controllability filter was
positive.
|
---|