Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos

It has long been known that sight was a crucial component of the fifth-century Athenian theatre. And while that is true, it can also be argued that aurality, the ability to hear and be heard, is an equally important aspect of Athenian drama. This dissertation strives to reclaim a place for hearing i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robinson, Miranda
Other Authors: Wohl, Victoria
Language:en_ca
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/65734
id ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-65734
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-657342014-08-23T04:12:54ZWays of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous TyrannosRobinson, MirandaSophokleshearing0465067902890294It has long been known that sight was a crucial component of the fifth-century Athenian theatre. And while that is true, it can also be argued that aurality, the ability to hear and be heard, is an equally important aspect of Athenian drama. This dissertation strives to reclaim a place for hearing in studies on tragedy generally and on Sophokles in particular. Adopting terms from radio theory and media theory, I suggest that Athens was both an acoustic space and an aural community. In the course of an examination of four tragedies, I engage with the following question: how do the characters in these plays hear? Analyzing each play in turn, I show how hearing can occur physically, socially, publically and politically respectively. For Elektra, hearing is a physical and psychic blow; for Philoktetes, hearing is how he connects with the world around him and how he tries to reconnect with people; for Deianeira, hearing is a dangerous phenomenon capable over overturing her own predictions and capable of causing her to lose control of the final shape of her aural reputation; for Oidipous, hearing is an expression of his political status and ultimately a cause of his fall from power. The results of this study show that, in each case, the act of hearing is an invasive process in which the sonant object, mobile and semi-autonomous, can intrude upon new spaces, stage and body alike. This dissertation contributes to a growing body of literature on aurality in tragedy and enhances our understanding of the interconnections between hearing, society, politics, and the individual.Wohl, Victoria2014-062014-08-22T19:31:16ZNO_RESTRICTION2014-08-22T19:31:16Z2014-08-22Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/65734en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic Sophokles
hearing
0465
0679
0289
0294
spellingShingle Sophokles
hearing
0465
0679
0289
0294
Robinson, Miranda
Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
description It has long been known that sight was a crucial component of the fifth-century Athenian theatre. And while that is true, it can also be argued that aurality, the ability to hear and be heard, is an equally important aspect of Athenian drama. This dissertation strives to reclaim a place for hearing in studies on tragedy generally and on Sophokles in particular. Adopting terms from radio theory and media theory, I suggest that Athens was both an acoustic space and an aural community. In the course of an examination of four tragedies, I engage with the following question: how do the characters in these plays hear? Analyzing each play in turn, I show how hearing can occur physically, socially, publically and politically respectively. For Elektra, hearing is a physical and psychic blow; for Philoktetes, hearing is how he connects with the world around him and how he tries to reconnect with people; for Deianeira, hearing is a dangerous phenomenon capable over overturing her own predictions and capable of causing her to lose control of the final shape of her aural reputation; for Oidipous, hearing is an expression of his political status and ultimately a cause of his fall from power. The results of this study show that, in each case, the act of hearing is an invasive process in which the sonant object, mobile and semi-autonomous, can intrude upon new spaces, stage and body alike. This dissertation contributes to a growing body of literature on aurality in tragedy and enhances our understanding of the interconnections between hearing, society, politics, and the individual.
author2 Wohl, Victoria
author_facet Wohl, Victoria
Robinson, Miranda
author Robinson, Miranda
author_sort Robinson, Miranda
title Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
title_short Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
title_full Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
title_fullStr Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
title_full_unstemmed Ways of Hearing in Sophokles: Auditory Spaces and Social Dynamics in the Elektra, Philoktetes, Trachiniai, and Oidipous Tyrannos
title_sort ways of hearing in sophokles: auditory spaces and social dynamics in the elektra, philoktetes, trachiniai, and oidipous tyrannos
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/65734
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonmiranda waysofhearinginsophoklesauditoryspacesandsocialdynamicsintheelektraphiloktetestrachiniaiandoidipoustyrannos
_version_ 1716711075801464832