The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity

Local and federal governments, public school boards, and higher education institutions have been promoting online courses in their commitment to accommodating public needs, widening access to materials, sharing intellectual resources, and reducing costs. However, researchers of education needs to co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oztok, Murat
Other Authors: Brett, Clare
Language:en_ca
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/43687
id ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-43687
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-436872014-01-14T03:59:21ZThe Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and InequityOztok, MuratOnline LearningWhitenessCultural HegemonySocio-Cultural Learning07100515Local and federal governments, public school boards, and higher education institutions have been promoting online courses in their commitment to accommodating public needs, widening access to materials, sharing intellectual resources, and reducing costs. However, researchers of education needs to consider the often ignored yet important issue of equity since disregarding the issue of inequity in online education may create suboptimal consequences for students. This dissertation work, therefore, investigates the issues of social justice and equity in online education. I argue that equity is situated between the tensions of various social structures in a broader cultural context and can be thought of as a fair distribution of opportunities to participate. This understanding is built upon the idea that individuals have different values, goals, and interests; nevertheless, the online learning context may not provide fair opportunities for individuals to follow their own learning trajectories. Particularly, online learning environments can reproduce inequitable learning conditions when the context requires certain individuals to assimilate mainstream beliefs and values at the expense of their own identities. Since identifications have certain social and political consequences by enabling or constraining individuals’ access to educational resources, individuals may try to be identified in line with culturally-hegemonic perspectives in order to gain or secure their access to educational resources or to legitimize their learning experiences. In this interview study, I conceptualize online courses within their broader socio-historical context and analyze how macro-level social structures, namely the concept of whiteness, can reproduce inequity in micro-level online learning practices. By questioning who has control over the conditions for the production of knowledge, values, and identification, I investigate how socially accepted bodies of thoughts, beliefs, values, and feelings that give meaning to individuals’ daily-practices may create inequitable learning conditions in day-to-day online learning practices. In specific, I analyze how those who are identified as non-White experience “double-bind” with respect to stereotypification on one hand, anonymity on the other. Building on this analysis, I illustrate how those who are identified as non-White have to constantly negotiate their legitimacy and right to be in the online environment.Brett, Clare2013-112014-01-13T21:07:43ZNO_RESTRICTION2014-01-13T21:07:43Z2014-01-13Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/43687en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic Online Learning
Whiteness
Cultural Hegemony
Socio-Cultural Learning
0710
0515
spellingShingle Online Learning
Whiteness
Cultural Hegemony
Socio-Cultural Learning
0710
0515
Oztok, Murat
The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
description Local and federal governments, public school boards, and higher education institutions have been promoting online courses in their commitment to accommodating public needs, widening access to materials, sharing intellectual resources, and reducing costs. However, researchers of education needs to consider the often ignored yet important issue of equity since disregarding the issue of inequity in online education may create suboptimal consequences for students. This dissertation work, therefore, investigates the issues of social justice and equity in online education. I argue that equity is situated between the tensions of various social structures in a broader cultural context and can be thought of as a fair distribution of opportunities to participate. This understanding is built upon the idea that individuals have different values, goals, and interests; nevertheless, the online learning context may not provide fair opportunities for individuals to follow their own learning trajectories. Particularly, online learning environments can reproduce inequitable learning conditions when the context requires certain individuals to assimilate mainstream beliefs and values at the expense of their own identities. Since identifications have certain social and political consequences by enabling or constraining individuals’ access to educational resources, individuals may try to be identified in line with culturally-hegemonic perspectives in order to gain or secure their access to educational resources or to legitimize their learning experiences. In this interview study, I conceptualize online courses within their broader socio-historical context and analyze how macro-level social structures, namely the concept of whiteness, can reproduce inequity in micro-level online learning practices. By questioning who has control over the conditions for the production of knowledge, values, and identification, I investigate how socially accepted bodies of thoughts, beliefs, values, and feelings that give meaning to individuals’ daily-practices may create inequitable learning conditions in day-to-day online learning practices. In specific, I analyze how those who are identified as non-White experience “double-bind” with respect to stereotypification on one hand, anonymity on the other. Building on this analysis, I illustrate how those who are identified as non-White have to constantly negotiate their legitimacy and right to be in the online environment.
author2 Brett, Clare
author_facet Brett, Clare
Oztok, Murat
author Oztok, Murat
author_sort Oztok, Murat
title The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
title_short The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
title_full The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
title_fullStr The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
title_full_unstemmed The Hidden Curriculum of Online Learning: Discourses of Whiteness, Social Absence, and Inequity
title_sort hidden curriculum of online learning: discourses of whiteness, social absence, and inequity
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/43687
work_keys_str_mv AT oztokmurat thehiddencurriculumofonlinelearningdiscoursesofwhitenesssocialabsenceandinequity
AT oztokmurat hiddencurriculumofonlinelearningdiscoursesofwhitenesssocialabsenceandinequity
_version_ 1716623626923409408