A Comparative Constitutional Analysis of the Judicial Treatment of Torture Between Israel and the United States: Navigating the Contentious Issue of Legality vs Policy in National Security Matters
This comparative legal analysis evaluates the issue of terrorism and how it has been dealt with respectively by the United States and Israeli Supreme Courts. Since the events of 9/11, combating terrorism has become one of the primary concerns of the US government while it is a matter that has pervad...
Main Author: | Willschick, Elliott |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Weinrib, Lorraine |
Language: | en_ca |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25515 |
Similar Items
-
A Comparative Constitutional Analysis of the Judicial Treatment of Torture Between Israel and the United States: Navigating the Contentious Issue of Legality vs Policy in National Security Matters
by: Willschick, Elliott
Published: (2010) -
Reframing domestic violence as torture or terrorism
by: Marcus Isabel
Published: (2014-01-01) -
NOVÍ AKTÉŘI NA POLI VÁLEČNÝCH KONFLIKTŮ
by: Jakub Fucik, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01) -
The Study of Torture: Why It Persists, Why Perceptions of It are Malleable, and Why It is Difficult to Eradicate
by: Erin M. Kearns
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Torture Survivor Advocacy Nonprofits and Representation on the Internet: The Case of Freedom From Torture
by: Watkins, Sean Edward
Published: (2013)