Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes

This thesis deals with the nature and definition of phonological similarity and shows that, when similarity plays a role in the motivation of phonological processes, it is evaluated over abstract, phonological features and not purely phonetic properties. Empirical evidence for this position is drawn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mackenzie, Sara
Other Authors: Dresher, B. Elan
Language:en_ca
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/17474
id ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-17474
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TORONTO-oai-tspace.library.utoronto.ca-1807-174742013-11-01T04:10:34ZContrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony ProcessesMackenzie, Saraphonologysimilaritycontrastconsonant harmony0290This thesis deals with the nature and definition of phonological similarity and shows that, when similarity plays a role in the motivation of phonological processes, it is evaluated over abstract, phonological features and not purely phonetic properties. Empirical evidence for this position is drawn from the domain of consonant harmony. Typological studies of consonant harmony (Hansson 2001, Rose and Walker 2004) have argued that segments which interact in consonant harmony processes must be highly similar to one another. This thesis provides analyses of a range of consonant harmony processes and demonstrates that, in each case, the notion of similarity needed in order to determine participating segments is evaluated over contrastive feature specifications. Contrastive specifications are established according to language-specific feature hierarchies (Jackobson and Halle 1956, Dresher 2003, forthcoming) with some features taking scope over others. Languages analyzed in some detail include Bumo Izon, Kalabari Ijo, Hausa, Dholuo, Anywa, Tzutujil and Aymara. Two definitions of similarity are proposed in order to account for two sets of cases. In one set of consonant harmony processes, interacting segments are similar in the sense that they constitute the natural class of segments contrastively specified in the harmonic feature. In another set of cases, participating segments must be similar according to the following definition; they must differ in only a single marked and contrastive feature specification.Dresher, B. Elan2009-032009-07-16T18:20:12ZNO_RESTRICTION2009-07-16T18:20:12Z2009-07-16T18:20:12ZThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/1807/17474en_ca
collection NDLTD
language en_ca
sources NDLTD
topic phonology
similarity
contrast
consonant harmony
0290
spellingShingle phonology
similarity
contrast
consonant harmony
0290
Mackenzie, Sara
Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
description This thesis deals with the nature and definition of phonological similarity and shows that, when similarity plays a role in the motivation of phonological processes, it is evaluated over abstract, phonological features and not purely phonetic properties. Empirical evidence for this position is drawn from the domain of consonant harmony. Typological studies of consonant harmony (Hansson 2001, Rose and Walker 2004) have argued that segments which interact in consonant harmony processes must be highly similar to one another. This thesis provides analyses of a range of consonant harmony processes and demonstrates that, in each case, the notion of similarity needed in order to determine participating segments is evaluated over contrastive feature specifications. Contrastive specifications are established according to language-specific feature hierarchies (Jackobson and Halle 1956, Dresher 2003, forthcoming) with some features taking scope over others. Languages analyzed in some detail include Bumo Izon, Kalabari Ijo, Hausa, Dholuo, Anywa, Tzutujil and Aymara. Two definitions of similarity are proposed in order to account for two sets of cases. In one set of consonant harmony processes, interacting segments are similar in the sense that they constitute the natural class of segments contrastively specified in the harmonic feature. In another set of cases, participating segments must be similar according to the following definition; they must differ in only a single marked and contrastive feature specification.
author2 Dresher, B. Elan
author_facet Dresher, B. Elan
Mackenzie, Sara
author Mackenzie, Sara
author_sort Mackenzie, Sara
title Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
title_short Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
title_full Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
title_fullStr Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
title_full_unstemmed Contrast and Similarity in Consonant Harmony Processes
title_sort contrast and similarity in consonant harmony processes
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1807/17474
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenziesara contrastandsimilarityinconsonantharmonyprocesses
_version_ 1716611643465531392