A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment

ABSTRACT <bold>A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment</bold> KELLY R. JAMES, AMY N. ADAMS, KELLI M. CRISP, BRIAN B. FRANKLIN, HEATHER J. HEEFNER, ANDREAS KREUTZER, DIEGO X....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James, Kelly Rebekah
Other Authors: Joel B Mitchell
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Texas Christian University 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05222013-121156/
id ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05222013-121156
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic College of Health and Human Sciences
spellingShingle College of Health and Human Sciences
James, Kelly Rebekah
A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
description ABSTRACT <bold>A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment</bold> KELLY R. JAMES, AMY N. ADAMS, KELLI M. CRISP, BRIAN B. FRANKLIN, HEATHER J. HEEFNER, ANDREAS KREUTZER, DIEGO X. MONTALVO, MARCEL G. TURNER, MELODY D. PHILLIPS and JOEL B. MITCHELL Exercise Physiology Laboratory; Kinesiology Dept.; Texas Christian University; Fort Worth, TX <bold>Introduction:</bold> Non-invasive temperature monitoring with a sensor mounted inside protective headgear such as a football or military helmet or a construction hardhat may be an effective method of detecting temperatures that are indicative of increased risk of heat illness. Hothead Technologies has developed a system for providing temperature information to medical personnel responsible for the health of the individual. <bold>Purpose:</bold> The purposes of this study were to establish the relationship between in-hardhat temperature (Tih) readings, markers of physiological strain and perceptual responses, and to determine the differences between the in-helmet temperature readings and core temperature (Tc) as measured by rectal (Tre) and esophageal (Tes) probes. <bold>Methods:</bold> Thirty males (age, 24.57 ± 4.32 years; height 180.51 ±7.06 cm; body mass, 81.06 ±9.35 kg; percent body fat, 13.76 ±5.11; VO2max, 46.84 ± 7.10 mL/Kg/min) completed two experimental trials separated by a minimum of one week: a continuous submaximal exercise (CSE) condition and a series of high intensity 30-second sprints (HIE) with a one-minute rest period between each sprint. Exercise in both conditions was carried out in a 36<super>o</super> C environment with a relative humidity of 40% while wearing a standard construction hardhat with a sensor mounted in the forehead area of the head strap, and continued until one of the following two criteria was met: the subject voluntarily terminated the session, or the subject's Tc reached 39.5<super>o</super>C. Temperatures, heart rate, cardiorespiratory, and perceptual responses were monitored throughout, and balance error scoring system (BESS) and mental function tests were conducted before and after exercise. A physiological strain index (PSI) was calculated from Tc and HR. <bold>Results:</bold> <TABLE> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> Condition </TD> <TD> Post Tih </TD> <TD> Post Tre </TD> <TD> Post Tes </TD> <TD> BESS Firm Pre </TD> <TD> BESS Firm Post </TD> <TD> BESS Foam Pre </TD> <TD> BESS Foam Post </TD> <TD> PSI Tre </TD> <TD> PSI Tes </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CSE </TD> <TD> 38.77 ± 0.41</TD> <TD> 38.90 ± 0.49</TD> <TD> 39.29 ± 0.58 </TD> <TD> 2.73 ± 2.41</TD> <TD> 7.17 ± 3.81</TD> <TD> 11.33 ± 4.38</TD> <TD> 15.50 ± 4.78</TD> <TD> 9.18 ± 1.11</TD> <TD> 10.04 ± 1.05</TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CV </TD> <TD> 1.07% </TD> <TD> 1.25% </TD> <TD> 1.48% </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> HIE </TD> <TD> 38.76 ± 0.37 </TD> <TD> 38.91 ± 0.47 </TD> <TD> 39.19 ± 0.57 </TD> <TD> 3.67 ± 2.59 </TD> <TD> 7.37 ± 4.10 </TD> <TD> 10.80 ± 3.46 </TD> <TD> 15.53 ± 5.55 </TD> <TD> 9.29 ± 0.99 </TD> <TD> 9.86 ± 1.02 </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CV </TD> <TD> 0.96% </TD> <TD> 1.21% </TD> <TD> 1.45%</TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> <bold>Table 1a. Temperature Responses (<super>o</super> C), BESS results and PSI (mean + SD)</bold> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The general agreement between the Tih and other temperature measures along with the consistency as indicated by the low coefficient of variation in the recordings of the Tih sensors at the point of termination suggest that this device may have application as a warning system for impending heat-related problems.
author2 Joel B Mitchell
author_facet Joel B Mitchell
James, Kelly Rebekah
author James, Kelly Rebekah
author_sort James, Kelly Rebekah
title A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
title_short A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
title_full A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
title_fullStr A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment
title_sort comparison of temperatures inside protective headgear with indicators of physiological strain and core temperatures during exercise in a hot environment
publisher Texas Christian University
publishDate 2013
url http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05222013-121156/
work_keys_str_mv AT jameskellyrebekah acomparisonoftemperaturesinsideprotectiveheadgearwithindicatorsofphysiologicalstrainandcoretemperaturesduringexerciseinahotenvironment
AT jameskellyrebekah comparisonoftemperaturesinsideprotectiveheadgearwithindicatorsofphysiologicalstrainandcoretemperaturesduringexerciseinahotenvironment
_version_ 1716585656690409473
spelling ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05222013-1211562013-05-23T03:53:46Z A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment James, Kelly Rebekah College of Health and Human Sciences ABSTRACT <bold>A Comparison of Temperatures Inside Protective Headgear With Indicators of Physiological Strain and Core Temperatures During Exercise in a Hot Environment</bold> KELLY R. JAMES, AMY N. ADAMS, KELLI M. CRISP, BRIAN B. FRANKLIN, HEATHER J. HEEFNER, ANDREAS KREUTZER, DIEGO X. MONTALVO, MARCEL G. TURNER, MELODY D. PHILLIPS and JOEL B. MITCHELL Exercise Physiology Laboratory; Kinesiology Dept.; Texas Christian University; Fort Worth, TX <bold>Introduction:</bold> Non-invasive temperature monitoring with a sensor mounted inside protective headgear such as a football or military helmet or a construction hardhat may be an effective method of detecting temperatures that are indicative of increased risk of heat illness. Hothead Technologies has developed a system for providing temperature information to medical personnel responsible for the health of the individual. <bold>Purpose:</bold> The purposes of this study were to establish the relationship between in-hardhat temperature (Tih) readings, markers of physiological strain and perceptual responses, and to determine the differences between the in-helmet temperature readings and core temperature (Tc) as measured by rectal (Tre) and esophageal (Tes) probes. <bold>Methods:</bold> Thirty males (age, 24.57 ± 4.32 years; height 180.51 ±7.06 cm; body mass, 81.06 ±9.35 kg; percent body fat, 13.76 ±5.11; VO2max, 46.84 ± 7.10 mL/Kg/min) completed two experimental trials separated by a minimum of one week: a continuous submaximal exercise (CSE) condition and a series of high intensity 30-second sprints (HIE) with a one-minute rest period between each sprint. Exercise in both conditions was carried out in a 36<super>o</super> C environment with a relative humidity of 40% while wearing a standard construction hardhat with a sensor mounted in the forehead area of the head strap, and continued until one of the following two criteria was met: the subject voluntarily terminated the session, or the subject's Tc reached 39.5<super>o</super>C. Temperatures, heart rate, cardiorespiratory, and perceptual responses were monitored throughout, and balance error scoring system (BESS) and mental function tests were conducted before and after exercise. A physiological strain index (PSI) was calculated from Tc and HR. <bold>Results:</bold> <TABLE> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> Condition </TD> <TD> Post Tih </TD> <TD> Post Tre </TD> <TD> Post Tes </TD> <TD> BESS Firm Pre </TD> <TD> BESS Firm Post </TD> <TD> BESS Foam Pre </TD> <TD> BESS Foam Post </TD> <TD> PSI Tre </TD> <TD> PSI Tes </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CSE </TD> <TD> 38.77 ± 0.41</TD> <TD> 38.90 ± 0.49</TD> <TD> 39.29 ± 0.58 </TD> <TD> 2.73 ± 2.41</TD> <TD> 7.17 ± 3.81</TD> <TD> 11.33 ± 4.38</TD> <TD> 15.50 ± 4.78</TD> <TD> 9.18 ± 1.11</TD> <TD> 10.04 ± 1.05</TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CV </TD> <TD> 1.07% </TD> <TD> 1.25% </TD> <TD> 1.48% </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> HIE </TD> <TD> 38.76 ± 0.37 </TD> <TD> 38.91 ± 0.47 </TD> <TD> 39.19 ± 0.57 </TD> <TD> 3.67 ± 2.59 </TD> <TD> 7.37 ± 4.10 </TD> <TD> 10.80 ± 3.46 </TD> <TD> 15.53 ± 5.55 </TD> <TD> 9.29 ± 0.99 </TD> <TD> 9.86 ± 1.02 </TD> </TR> <TR ALIGN="CENTER"> <TD> CV </TD> <TD> 0.96% </TD> <TD> 1.21% </TD> <TD> 1.45%</TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> <TD> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> <bold>Table 1a. Temperature Responses (<super>o</super> C), BESS results and PSI (mean + SD)</bold> <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The general agreement between the Tih and other temperature measures along with the consistency as indicated by the low coefficient of variation in the recordings of the Tih sensors at the point of termination suggest that this device may have application as a warning system for impending heat-related problems. Joel B Mitchell Melody D Phillips Philip Esposito Sarah Manspeaker Texas Christian University 2013-05-22 text application/pdf application/octet-stream http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05222013-121156/ http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05222013-121156/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to TCU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.