Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy

This thesis reported the communicative constitution of organizational democracy through the use of dissent. Six board meetings that occurred over six months were coded and then analyzed to examine whether dissent was sufficient for the communicative constitution of organizational democracy and, if s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ragland, John Parker
Other Authors: Johny T Garner
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Texas Christian University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-122038/
id ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-122038
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-1220382014-05-14T04:11:06Z Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy Ragland, John Parker College of Communication This thesis reported the communicative constitution of organizational democracy through the use of dissent. Six board meetings that occurred over six months were coded and then analyzed to examine whether dissent was sufficient for the communicative constitution of organizational democracy and, if so, how dissent constituted organizational democracy. Markov chain and phasic analyses were used to characterize the communicative patterns that occurred during these meetings and predict the trajectory of those conversations. The results indicated that dissent was sufficient for the communicative constitution of organizational democracy. Specifically, the results of this thesis evidenced that dissent contributed to the organization of a dissent climate and the dissolution of a mimetic climate; that dissent is less a predictor organizational change than other members' willingness to engage with dissent; and that the dissent climate was characterized by behaviors such as relational integration, engagement, and participation in decision-making processes, each of which were indicative of organizational democracy. Johny T Garner Paul L Witt Andrew M Ledbetter Texas Christian University 2014-05-13 text application/pdf application/msword http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-122038/ http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-122038/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to TCU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic College of Communication
spellingShingle College of Communication
Ragland, John Parker
Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
description This thesis reported the communicative constitution of organizational democracy through the use of dissent. Six board meetings that occurred over six months were coded and then analyzed to examine whether dissent was sufficient for the communicative constitution of organizational democracy and, if so, how dissent constituted organizational democracy. Markov chain and phasic analyses were used to characterize the communicative patterns that occurred during these meetings and predict the trajectory of those conversations. The results indicated that dissent was sufficient for the communicative constitution of organizational democracy. Specifically, the results of this thesis evidenced that dissent contributed to the organization of a dissent climate and the dissolution of a mimetic climate; that dissent is less a predictor organizational change than other members' willingness to engage with dissent; and that the dissent climate was characterized by behaviors such as relational integration, engagement, and participation in decision-making processes, each of which were indicative of organizational democracy.
author2 Johny T Garner
author_facet Johny T Garner
Ragland, John Parker
author Ragland, John Parker
author_sort Ragland, John Parker
title Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
title_short Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
title_full Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
title_fullStr Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Dissent in Top-Tier Meetings as Communication Constitutive of Organizational Democracy
title_sort exploring dissent in top-tier meetings as communication constitutive of organizational democracy
publisher Texas Christian University
publishDate 2014
url http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-122038/
work_keys_str_mv AT raglandjohnparker exploringdissentintoptiermeetingsascommunicationconstitutiveoforganizationaldemocracy
_version_ 1716667082653827072