EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Althou...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
Texas Christian University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ |
id |
ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-114948 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-1149482014-05-14T04:11:06Z EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES Morin, Amanda Leigh College of Science and Engineering Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Although epistemic and teleologic strategies of self-persuasion have been shown to be equally effective for immediate change, no empirical tests have shown one method to provide attitude change that is either longer lasting or less susceptible to further change compared to the other. The present research tested whether preference for epistemic versus teleologic strategies leads to new attitudes that are more persistent (Experiment 1) or resistant (Experiment 2) to change. The resistance hypothesis (in Experiment 2) was supported, but more for individuals low than high in self-control. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. Charles G Lord Sarah Hill Cathleen R Cox David Cross Naomi Ekas Texas Christian University 2014-05-13 text application/pdf application/octet-stream http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to TCU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
College of Science and Engineering |
spellingShingle |
College of Science and Engineering Morin, Amanda Leigh EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
description |
Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Although epistemic and teleologic strategies of self-persuasion have been shown to be equally effective for immediate change, no empirical tests have shown one method to provide attitude change that is either longer lasting or less susceptible to further change compared to the other. The present research tested whether preference for epistemic versus teleologic strategies leads to new attitudes that are more persistent (Experiment 1) or resistant (Experiment 2) to change. The resistance hypothesis (in Experiment 2) was supported, but more for individuals low than high in self-control. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. |
author2 |
Charles G Lord |
author_facet |
Charles G Lord Morin, Amanda Leigh |
author |
Morin, Amanda Leigh |
author_sort |
Morin, Amanda Leigh |
title |
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
title_short |
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
title_full |
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
title_fullStr |
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES |
title_sort |
effects of epistemic and teleologic attitude change strategies on persistence and resistance of subsequent attitudes |
publisher |
Texas Christian University |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT morinamandaleigh effectsofepistemicandteleologicattitudechangestrategiesonpersistenceandresistanceofsubsequentattitudes |
_version_ |
1716667080515780608 |