EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES

Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Althou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morin, Amanda Leigh
Other Authors: Charles G Lord
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Texas Christian University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/
id ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-114948
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TCU-oai-etd.tcu.edu-etd-05132014-1149482014-05-14T04:11:06Z EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES Morin, Amanda Leigh College of Science and Engineering Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Although epistemic and teleologic strategies of self-persuasion have been shown to be equally effective for immediate change, no empirical tests have shown one method to provide attitude change that is either longer lasting or less susceptible to further change compared to the other. The present research tested whether preference for epistemic versus teleologic strategies leads to new attitudes that are more persistent (Experiment 1) or resistant (Experiment 2) to change. The resistance hypothesis (in Experiment 2) was supported, but more for individuals low than high in self-control. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. Charles G Lord Sarah Hill Cathleen R Cox David Cross Naomi Ekas Texas Christian University 2014-05-13 text application/pdf application/octet-stream http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to TCU or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic College of Science and Engineering
spellingShingle College of Science and Engineering
Morin, Amanda Leigh
EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
description Previous theory and research shows that people can change unwanted attitudes cognitively, either by epistemic strategies (altering the perceived valence of the attitude object's attributes) or by teleologic strategies (altering the accessibility of the attitude object's attributes). Although epistemic and teleologic strategies of self-persuasion have been shown to be equally effective for immediate change, no empirical tests have shown one method to provide attitude change that is either longer lasting or less susceptible to further change compared to the other. The present research tested whether preference for epistemic versus teleologic strategies leads to new attitudes that are more persistent (Experiment 1) or resistant (Experiment 2) to change. The resistance hypothesis (in Experiment 2) was supported, but more for individuals low than high in self-control. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed.
author2 Charles G Lord
author_facet Charles G Lord
Morin, Amanda Leigh
author Morin, Amanda Leigh
author_sort Morin, Amanda Leigh
title EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
title_short EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
title_full EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
title_fullStr EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
title_full_unstemmed EFFECTS OF EPISTEMIC AND TELEOLOGIC ATTITUDE CHANGE STRATEGIES ON PERSISTENCE AND RESISTANCE OF SUBSEQUENT ATTITUDES
title_sort effects of epistemic and teleologic attitude change strategies on persistence and resistance of subsequent attitudes
publisher Texas Christian University
publishDate 2014
url http://etd.tcu.edu/etdfiles/available/etd-05132014-114948/
work_keys_str_mv AT morinamandaleigh effectsofepistemicandteleologicattitudechangestrategiesonpersistenceandresistanceofsubsequentattitudes
_version_ 1716667080515780608