Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
Upon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be aba...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593 |
id |
ndltd-RICE-oai-scholarship.rice.edu-1911-13593 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-RICE-oai-scholarship.rice.edu-1911-135932013-10-23T04:08:42ZAleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design disciplineRobinson, Bobby NealArchitecturePhilosophyUpon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be abandoned in a relativistic critique. It is only possible to resign oneself to the methods and discipline of chance as a design directive. Therefore, all information, regardless of perceived significance becomes equally (ir) relevant to subsequent impositions of design decisions. Appropriate versus inappropriate is merely academic and moot. An application of non-methodological chance design is presented herein.Balfour, Alan2009-06-03T23:51:56Z2009-06-03T23:51:56Z1992ThesisText131 p.application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593eng |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Architecture Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Architecture Philosophy Robinson, Bobby Neal Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
description |
Upon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be abandoned in a relativistic critique. It is only possible to resign oneself to the methods and discipline of chance as a design directive. Therefore, all information, regardless of perceived significance becomes equally (ir) relevant to subsequent impositions of design decisions. Appropriate versus inappropriate is merely academic and moot. An application of non-methodological chance design is presented herein. |
author2 |
Balfour, Alan |
author_facet |
Balfour, Alan Robinson, Bobby Neal |
author |
Robinson, Bobby Neal |
author_sort |
Robinson, Bobby Neal |
title |
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
title_short |
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
title_full |
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
title_fullStr |
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline |
title_sort |
aleatory architecture: the ethics of chance as design discipline |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT robinsonbobbyneal aleatoryarchitecturetheethicsofchanceasdesigndiscipline |
_version_ |
1716609944673845248 |