Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline

Upon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be aba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robinson, Bobby Neal
Other Authors: Balfour, Alan
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593
id ndltd-RICE-oai-scholarship.rice.edu-1911-13593
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-RICE-oai-scholarship.rice.edu-1911-135932013-10-23T04:08:42ZAleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design disciplineRobinson, Bobby NealArchitecturePhilosophyUpon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be abandoned in a relativistic critique. It is only possible to resign oneself to the methods and discipline of chance as a design directive. Therefore, all information, regardless of perceived significance becomes equally (ir) relevant to subsequent impositions of design decisions. Appropriate versus inappropriate is merely academic and moot. An application of non-methodological chance design is presented herein.Balfour, Alan2009-06-03T23:51:56Z2009-06-03T23:51:56Z1992ThesisText131 p.application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Architecture
Philosophy
spellingShingle Architecture
Philosophy
Robinson, Bobby Neal
Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
description Upon acceptance that what is perceived to be "true" is related specifically to a given circumstance under given conditions in which all variables cannot be known, sustaining a "conviction" in the design process is no longer ethical. Precedent concept as a working goal must be abandoned in a relativistic critique. It is only possible to resign oneself to the methods and discipline of chance as a design directive. Therefore, all information, regardless of perceived significance becomes equally (ir) relevant to subsequent impositions of design decisions. Appropriate versus inappropriate is merely academic and moot. An application of non-methodological chance design is presented herein.
author2 Balfour, Alan
author_facet Balfour, Alan
Robinson, Bobby Neal
author Robinson, Bobby Neal
author_sort Robinson, Bobby Neal
title Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
title_short Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
title_full Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
title_fullStr Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
title_full_unstemmed Aleatory architecture: The ethics of chance as design discipline
title_sort aleatory architecture: the ethics of chance as design discipline
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1911/13593
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsonbobbyneal aleatoryarchitecturetheethicsofchanceasdesigndiscipline
_version_ 1716609944673845248