Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale

Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition? Loc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wulf, Monika, Heinken, Thilo
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Universität Potsdam 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46080
http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2010/4608/
id ndltd-Potsdam-oai-kobv.de-opus-ubp-4608
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-Potsdam-oai-kobv.de-opus-ubp-46082013-01-08T00:59:09Z Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale Wulf, Monika Heinken, Thilo Clonal growth diaspore weight dispersal potential forest specialist generalist emergent group Life sciences Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition? Location: Three deciduous and one coniferous recent forest areas in Brandenburg, NE Germany. Methods: In 34 and 21 transects in coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively, we studied the occurrence and percentage cover of vascular plants in a total of 150 plots in ancient stands, 315 in recent stands and 55 at the ecotone. Habitat preference, diaspore weight, generative dispersal potential and clonal extension were used to explain mechanisms of local migration. Regression analysis was conducted to test whether migration distance was related to species’ life-history traits. Results: 25 species were significantly associated with ancient stands and ten species were significantly more frequent in recent stands. Tree and shrub species were good colonizers of recent coniferous and deciduous stands. In the coniferous stands, all herbaceous species showed a strong dispersal limitation during colonization, whereas in the deciduous stands generalist species may have survived in the grasslands which were present prior to afforestation. Conclusions: The fast colonization of recent stands by trees and shrubs can be explained by their effective dispersal via wind and animals. This, and the comparably efficient migration of herbaceous forest specialists into recent coniferous stands, implies that the conversion of coniferous into deciduous stands adjacent to ancient deciduous forests is promising even without planting of trees. Universität Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät. Institut für Biochemie und Biologie 2008 Postprint application/pdf urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46080 http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2010/4608/ Applied vegetation science. - 11 (2008), 3, S. 307 - 316, DOI: 10.3170/2008-7-18432 eng http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/doku/urheberrecht.php
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Clonal growth
diaspore weight
dispersal potential
forest specialist
generalist emergent group
Life sciences
spellingShingle Clonal growth
diaspore weight
dispersal potential
forest specialist
generalist emergent group
Life sciences
Wulf, Monika
Heinken, Thilo
Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
description Questions: 1. Are there differences among species in their preference for coniferous vs. deciduous forest? 2. Are tree and shrub species better colonizers of recent forest stands than herbaceous species? 3. Do colonization patterns of plant species groups depend on tree species composition? Location: Three deciduous and one coniferous recent forest areas in Brandenburg, NE Germany. Methods: In 34 and 21 transects in coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively, we studied the occurrence and percentage cover of vascular plants in a total of 150 plots in ancient stands, 315 in recent stands and 55 at the ecotone. Habitat preference, diaspore weight, generative dispersal potential and clonal extension were used to explain mechanisms of local migration. Regression analysis was conducted to test whether migration distance was related to species’ life-history traits. Results: 25 species were significantly associated with ancient stands and ten species were significantly more frequent in recent stands. Tree and shrub species were good colonizers of recent coniferous and deciduous stands. In the coniferous stands, all herbaceous species showed a strong dispersal limitation during colonization, whereas in the deciduous stands generalist species may have survived in the grasslands which were present prior to afforestation. Conclusions: The fast colonization of recent stands by trees and shrubs can be explained by their effective dispersal via wind and animals. This, and the comparably efficient migration of herbaceous forest specialists into recent coniferous stands, implies that the conversion of coniferous into deciduous stands adjacent to ancient deciduous forests is promising even without planting of trees.
author Wulf, Monika
Heinken, Thilo
author_facet Wulf, Monika
Heinken, Thilo
author_sort Wulf, Monika
title Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
title_short Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
title_full Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
title_fullStr Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
title_full_unstemmed Colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
title_sort colonization of recent coniferous versus deciduous forest stands by vascular plants at the local scale
publisher Universität Potsdam
publishDate 2008
url http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-46080
http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2010/4608/
work_keys_str_mv AT wulfmonika colonizationofrecentconiferousversusdeciduousforeststandsbyvascularplantsatthelocalscale
AT heinkenthilo colonizationofrecentconiferousversusdeciduousforeststandsbyvascularplantsatthelocalscale
_version_ 1716502352763027456