A broader view of the Cathedral: The meaning of the liability rule. Correcting a misapprehension
In this article, the author analyses the tort not only from a private view, but also from a public function as part of the legalpolitical- economic structure of a State. Likewise, he analyses the significance of the liability rule and how this social-democratic way of organizing law and entitlements...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Language: | Español |
| Published: |
IUS ET VERITAS
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/16394/16798 http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123520 |
| Summary: | In this article, the author analyses the tort not only from a private view, but also from a public function as part of the legalpolitical- economic structure of a State. Likewise, he analyses the significance of the liability rule and how this social-democratic way of organizing law and entitlements fixes the size of the liability;however, it is an inaccurate description of what occurs in the world, as in the case of eminent domain. Therefore, he claims a more significant economic role for the liability rule. === En el presente artículo, el autor analiza la responsabilidad extracontractual no solo desde una visión privada, sino también desde una función pública como parte de la estructura legal-política-económica de un Estado. Asimismo, analiza el significado de la regla de responsabilidad y de cómo esta manera social-demócrata de organizar el derecho y las titularidades fijan el tamaño de la responsabilidad; sin embargo, esta es una descripción inexacta de lo que ocurre en el mundo como en el caso de las expropiaciones. Por ello, afirma un papel económico más significativode la regla de responsabilidad. |
|---|