At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
<p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia’s “Fertile Crescent,” greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | EN |
Published: |
University of South Florida
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055 |
id |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-1605055 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-16050552015-12-17T03:57:58Z At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms Libengood, James Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science <p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia’s “Fertile Crescent,” greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how agricultural technologies directly created new social and institutional structures in codifying slavery into law, or how mercantile transactions are to be conducted. Similarly, GMOs are the result of modern agricultural technologies that are altering laws and society as a result of their implementation. This transformation informs the central inquiries of my research question: Why are GMOs necessary, and what influences do they have on the project of human rights? As our age is defined by the products of bioluminescent – or glow-in-the-dark – cats and goats that can excrete spider silk proteins from their mammary glands, these questions become essential. I conclude that the technology does not, at least conceptually, conflict with or undermine human rights. Instrumental reason has firm limitations in biological applications as well as conflict with its inherent anarchical nature. We are now compelled to question the utility of genetic engineering and if it merely places humanity into another precarious “arms race” with weeds and pests, in addition to the pressure of maintaining current dependencies of petrochemicals, fertilizers, and continued observations of ecological homeostasis.</p> University of South Florida 2015-12-15 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055 EN |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
EN |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science |
spellingShingle |
Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science Libengood, James At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
description |
<p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia’s “Fertile Crescent,” greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how agricultural technologies directly created new social and institutional structures in codifying slavery into law, or how mercantile transactions are to be conducted. Similarly, GMOs are the result of modern agricultural technologies that are altering laws and society as a result of their implementation. This transformation informs the central inquiries of my research question: Why are GMOs necessary, and what influences do they have on the project of human rights? As our age is defined by the products of bioluminescent – or glow-in-the-dark – cats and goats that can excrete spider silk proteins from their mammary glands, these questions become essential. I conclude that the technology does not, at least conceptually, conflict with or undermine human rights. Instrumental reason has firm limitations in biological applications as well as conflict with its inherent anarchical nature. We are now compelled to question the utility of genetic engineering and if it merely places humanity into another precarious “arms race” with weeds and pests, in addition to the pressure of maintaining current dependencies of petrochemicals, fertilizers, and continued observations of ecological homeostasis.</p> |
author |
Libengood, James |
author_facet |
Libengood, James |
author_sort |
Libengood, James |
title |
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
title_short |
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
title_full |
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
title_fullStr |
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms |
title_sort |
at the intersection of human agency and technology| genetically modified organisms |
publisher |
University of South Florida |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT libengoodjames attheintersectionofhumanagencyandtechnologygeneticallymodifiedorganisms |
_version_ |
1718152961989804032 |