At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms

<p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia&rsquo;s &ldquo;Fertile Crescent,&rdquo; greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Libengood, James
Language:EN
Published: University of South Florida 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-1605055
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-16050552015-12-17T03:57:58Z At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms Libengood, James Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science <p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia&rsquo;s &ldquo;Fertile Crescent,&rdquo; greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how agricultural technologies directly created new social and institutional structures in codifying slavery into law, or how mercantile transactions are to be conducted. Similarly, GMOs are the result of modern agricultural technologies that are altering laws and society as a result of their implementation. This transformation informs the central inquiries of my research question: Why are GMOs necessary, and what influences do they have on the project of human rights? As our age is defined by the products of bioluminescent &ndash; or glow-in-the-dark &ndash; cats and goats that can excrete spider silk proteins from their mammary glands, these questions become essential. I conclude that the technology does not, at least conceptually, conflict with or undermine human rights. Instrumental reason has firm limitations in biological applications as well as conflict with its inherent anarchical nature. We are now compelled to question the utility of genetic engineering and if it merely places humanity into another precarious &ldquo;arms race&rdquo; with weeds and pests, in addition to the pressure of maintaining current dependencies of petrochemicals, fertilizers, and continued observations of ecological homeostasis.</p> University of South Florida 2015-12-15 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science
spellingShingle Genetics|Environmental philosophy|Microbiology|Political science
Libengood, James
At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
description <p> Since the Neolithic period and the rise of agriculture along Mesopotamia&rsquo;s &ldquo;Fertile Crescent,&rdquo; greater societies have formed thus requiring laws and governance to ensure their continued preservation. The Babylonian Code of Hammurabi is one such example of how agricultural technologies directly created new social and institutional structures in codifying slavery into law, or how mercantile transactions are to be conducted. Similarly, GMOs are the result of modern agricultural technologies that are altering laws and society as a result of their implementation. This transformation informs the central inquiries of my research question: Why are GMOs necessary, and what influences do they have on the project of human rights? As our age is defined by the products of bioluminescent &ndash; or glow-in-the-dark &ndash; cats and goats that can excrete spider silk proteins from their mammary glands, these questions become essential. I conclude that the technology does not, at least conceptually, conflict with or undermine human rights. Instrumental reason has firm limitations in biological applications as well as conflict with its inherent anarchical nature. We are now compelled to question the utility of genetic engineering and if it merely places humanity into another precarious &ldquo;arms race&rdquo; with weeds and pests, in addition to the pressure of maintaining current dependencies of petrochemicals, fertilizers, and continued observations of ecological homeostasis.</p>
author Libengood, James
author_facet Libengood, James
author_sort Libengood, James
title At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
title_short At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
title_full At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
title_fullStr At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
title_full_unstemmed At the Intersection of Human Agency and Technology| Genetically Modified Organisms
title_sort at the intersection of human agency and technology| genetically modified organisms
publisher University of South Florida
publishDate 2015
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1605055
work_keys_str_mv AT libengoodjames attheintersectionofhumanagencyandtechnologygeneticallymodifiedorganisms
_version_ 1718152961989804032