Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona

<p> This thesis examines different methods of communicating volcanic hazards to the population of Flagstaff, Arizona using the results of a recent lava flow hazard assessment of the nearby San Francisco Volcanic Field (SFVF). Harburger (2014) determined that given a lava flow originating in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carter, Catherine S.
Language:EN
Published: University of South Florida 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1595006
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-1595006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-15950062015-08-06T04:20:03Z Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona Carter, Catherine S. Geology|Geophysics <p> This thesis examines different methods of communicating volcanic hazards to the population of Flagstaff, Arizona using the results of a recent lava flow hazard assessment of the nearby San Francisco Volcanic Field (SFVF). Harburger (2014) determined that given a lava flow originating in the SFVF, there is a statistical probability that it will inundate the city of Flagstaff or even originate from a vent within the city limits. Based on the recurrence rates for the most recent eruptions (3 x 10-4/year), the probability of lava flow inundation in Flagstaff is 1.1 x 10-5 per year. </p><p> This study considers the effects of three different communication methods on participants&rsquo; perceived risk. The methods were administered through a questionnaire and included a statement of probability of lava flow inundation per year, a statement of probability over a 100 year period, and an interactive lava flow map derived from the results of the lava flow hazard assessment. Each method was followed by questions gauging level of concern. Questionnaires were administered to 213 Flagstaff residents over a two week period in February 2015. </p><p> Results showed that levels of concern, rated from 1 (not concerned) to 5 (very concerned), varied based on each method of communication. The method with the greatest effect on perceived risk was the simulated lava flow map, while the first method with a one year odds resulted in a statistically lower mean rating of concern. It is suggested that the best way to change levels of perceived risk when communicating lava flow hazards includes a combination of comprehensible odds and visual aids. Further studies could also include visualization of the entire eruption scenario, including time scales and other volcanic hazards, which may have more effect on concern than a simplified visualization of lava flows.</p> University of South Florida 2015-08-04 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1595006 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Geology|Geophysics
spellingShingle Geology|Geophysics
Carter, Catherine S.
Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
description <p> This thesis examines different methods of communicating volcanic hazards to the population of Flagstaff, Arizona using the results of a recent lava flow hazard assessment of the nearby San Francisco Volcanic Field (SFVF). Harburger (2014) determined that given a lava flow originating in the SFVF, there is a statistical probability that it will inundate the city of Flagstaff or even originate from a vent within the city limits. Based on the recurrence rates for the most recent eruptions (3 x 10-4/year), the probability of lava flow inundation in Flagstaff is 1.1 x 10-5 per year. </p><p> This study considers the effects of three different communication methods on participants&rsquo; perceived risk. The methods were administered through a questionnaire and included a statement of probability of lava flow inundation per year, a statement of probability over a 100 year period, and an interactive lava flow map derived from the results of the lava flow hazard assessment. Each method was followed by questions gauging level of concern. Questionnaires were administered to 213 Flagstaff residents over a two week period in February 2015. </p><p> Results showed that levels of concern, rated from 1 (not concerned) to 5 (very concerned), varied based on each method of communication. The method with the greatest effect on perceived risk was the simulated lava flow map, while the first method with a one year odds resulted in a statistically lower mean rating of concern. It is suggested that the best way to change levels of perceived risk when communicating lava flow hazards includes a combination of comprehensible odds and visual aids. Further studies could also include visualization of the entire eruption scenario, including time scales and other volcanic hazards, which may have more effect on concern than a simplified visualization of lava flows.</p>
author Carter, Catherine S.
author_facet Carter, Catherine S.
author_sort Carter, Catherine S.
title Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
title_short Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
title_full Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
title_fullStr Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
title_full_unstemmed Communication of Lava Flow Hazards at the San Francisco Volcanic Field, Flagstaff, Arizona
title_sort communication of lava flow hazards at the san francisco volcanic field, flagstaff, arizona
publisher University of South Florida
publishDate 2015
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1595006
work_keys_str_mv AT cartercatherines communicationoflavaflowhazardsatthesanfranciscovolcanicfieldflagstaffarizona
_version_ 1716815708857303040