Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools

<p> This study examined students utilizing a computer-aided reading intervention Lexia Reading Core5 and the correlation with oral reading fluency for grades second through fourth at nine Title I schools in a medium-sized urban characteristic Midwestern school district. The researcher design u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burnight, Brian
Language:EN
Published: University of South Dakota 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10981590
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10981590
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-109815902018-12-06T16:41:53Z Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools Burnight, Brian Educational leadership|Educational administration|Elementary education|Reading instruction <p> This study examined students utilizing a computer-aided reading intervention Lexia Reading Core5 and the correlation with oral reading fluency for grades second through fourth at nine Title I schools in a medium-sized urban characteristic Midwestern school district. The researcher design utilizes a quantitative methodology to gauge the changes in reading scores measured for students utilizing Lexia Reading Core5 when utilized as a Tier I or Tier II intervention. The change in the dependent variable of student oral reading fluency rates from fall to spring as measured by the Formative Assessment System for Teachers (FAST) specifically the Curriculum-Based Measure for Reading (CBMR) determined student growth. The 2,514 students involved in the study came from nine Title I elementary schools in the Heartland School District for students in grades second through fourth. The student population in the study has characteristics of a typical urban school district that is a minority-majority school district in addition to approximately 34% of students being English language learners, with 95.1% free and reduced lunch rates. Students are distributed equally between grade levels with each grade having approximately one-third of the sample students. Gender was 51.45% male and 48.55% female. </p><p> The study supports a correlation between time and proficiency growth using Lexia Reading Core5 and student growth in oral reading fluency as measured by the CMBR assessment growth. This study supports the use of computer aided adaptive reading instruction for students in need of a Tier I or Tier II reading intervention.</p><p> University of South Dakota 2018-12-04 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10981590 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Educational leadership|Educational administration|Elementary education|Reading instruction
spellingShingle Educational leadership|Educational administration|Elementary education|Reading instruction
Burnight, Brian
Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
description <p> This study examined students utilizing a computer-aided reading intervention Lexia Reading Core5 and the correlation with oral reading fluency for grades second through fourth at nine Title I schools in a medium-sized urban characteristic Midwestern school district. The researcher design utilizes a quantitative methodology to gauge the changes in reading scores measured for students utilizing Lexia Reading Core5 when utilized as a Tier I or Tier II intervention. The change in the dependent variable of student oral reading fluency rates from fall to spring as measured by the Formative Assessment System for Teachers (FAST) specifically the Curriculum-Based Measure for Reading (CBMR) determined student growth. The 2,514 students involved in the study came from nine Title I elementary schools in the Heartland School District for students in grades second through fourth. The student population in the study has characteristics of a typical urban school district that is a minority-majority school district in addition to approximately 34% of students being English language learners, with 95.1% free and reduced lunch rates. Students are distributed equally between grade levels with each grade having approximately one-third of the sample students. Gender was 51.45% male and 48.55% female. </p><p> The study supports a correlation between time and proficiency growth using Lexia Reading Core5 and student growth in oral reading fluency as measured by the CMBR assessment growth. This study supports the use of computer aided adaptive reading instruction for students in need of a Tier I or Tier II reading intervention.</p><p>
author Burnight, Brian
author_facet Burnight, Brian
author_sort Burnight, Brian
title Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
title_short Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
title_full Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
title_fullStr Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
title_full_unstemmed Leading for Literacy| Lexia Reading Core5 and the Association with Oral Reading Fluency in Title I Schools
title_sort leading for literacy| lexia reading core5 and the association with oral reading fluency in title i schools
publisher University of South Dakota
publishDate 2018
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10981590
work_keys_str_mv AT burnightbrian leadingforliteracylexiareadingcore5andtheassociationwithoralreadingfluencyintitleischools
_version_ 1718799444956151808