Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle

<p> Maturing new technologies through the systems engineering lifecycle has been a perpetual issue for the U.S. systems engineering community. Although there are many reasons why technologies fail to mature, this study examines the perceptions of why technologies succeed. To examine these perc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davis, Carrie Elizabeth
Language:EN
Published: The George Washington University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10784602
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10784602
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-107846022018-04-27T04:09:58Z Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle Davis, Carrie Elizabeth Engineering <p> Maturing new technologies through the systems engineering lifecycle has been a perpetual issue for the U.S. systems engineering community. Although there are many reasons why technologies fail to mature, this study examines the perceptions of why technologies succeed. To examine these perceptions, this study proposes to extend an established marketing tool framework, the Technology Readiness Index (TRI), into the systems engineering space. The TRI was originally developed to understand customers&rsquo; and employees&rsquo; interactions with technology and their propensity to embrace cutting-edge technology, which is considered as a person&rsquo;s technology readiness. This study uses the TRI framework to survey the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community of successful technology maturation traits, and relate these perceptions to the systems engineering lifecycle. This survey framework, in combination with the Mann-Whitney U test method for determining statistical differences in non-parametric data, results in multiple common technology maturation perceptions throughout the systems engineering lifecycle, with cross-cutting themes of communicating regularly with interested parties, reducing implementation risk, and having a positive business case to sell to stakeholders. Moreover, it shows differences in the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community in relation to these common perceptions, as well as specific technology transition traits.</p><p> The George Washington University 2018-04-26 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10784602 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Engineering
spellingShingle Engineering
Davis, Carrie Elizabeth
Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
description <p> Maturing new technologies through the systems engineering lifecycle has been a perpetual issue for the U.S. systems engineering community. Although there are many reasons why technologies fail to mature, this study examines the perceptions of why technologies succeed. To examine these perceptions, this study proposes to extend an established marketing tool framework, the Technology Readiness Index (TRI), into the systems engineering space. The TRI was originally developed to understand customers&rsquo; and employees&rsquo; interactions with technology and their propensity to embrace cutting-edge technology, which is considered as a person&rsquo;s technology readiness. This study uses the TRI framework to survey the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community of successful technology maturation traits, and relate these perceptions to the systems engineering lifecycle. This survey framework, in combination with the Mann-Whitney U test method for determining statistical differences in non-parametric data, results in multiple common technology maturation perceptions throughout the systems engineering lifecycle, with cross-cutting themes of communicating regularly with interested parties, reducing implementation risk, and having a positive business case to sell to stakeholders. Moreover, it shows differences in the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community in relation to these common perceptions, as well as specific technology transition traits.</p><p>
author Davis, Carrie Elizabeth
author_facet Davis, Carrie Elizabeth
author_sort Davis, Carrie Elizabeth
title Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
title_short Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
title_full Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
title_fullStr Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
title_full_unstemmed Technology Maturation Framework| Extending the Technology Readiness Index to the Systems Engineering Lifecycle
title_sort technology maturation framework| extending the technology readiness index to the systems engineering lifecycle
publisher The George Washington University
publishDate 2018
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10784602
work_keys_str_mv AT daviscarrieelizabeth technologymaturationframeworkextendingthetechnologyreadinessindextothesystemsengineeringlifecycle
_version_ 1718632459078205440