Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political

<p> Explores the foundations of political community as understood in two complementary ways: first, in contemporary normative political and social theory. Second, in the history of politics and in the history of philosophy. Particular attention is given to David Hume, Adam Smith, and Edmund Bu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosensweig, Jason
Language:EN
Published: The University of Chicago 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10639185
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10639185
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-106391852017-12-21T16:17:48Z Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political Rosensweig, Jason Philosophy|History|Political science <p> Explores the foundations of political community as understood in two complementary ways: first, in contemporary normative political and social theory. Second, in the history of politics and in the history of philosophy. Particular attention is given to David Hume, Adam Smith, and Edmund Burke, as well as their relationship to contemporary political philosophers like Bernard Williams, John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Mills. Using Wittgenstein&rsquo;s concept of a form of life <i>(lebensform) </i> in the <i>Philosophical Investigations,</i> argues that there is a family within the history of political thought whose members share the understanding that a shared form of life, which develops organically and historically, is a necessary condition for a free society to work well. Examines how political and social obligation, trust and commerce, as well as sympathy and concepts of rights, all require interdependence and shared assumptions and expectations. This family balances the impulses of political realism and political idealism, though is somewhat more anti-idealist than pro-realist. Bottom-up thinking that doesn&rsquo;t fall in to the trap of idealism or of rationalism, due to a commitment to epistemological limits and the recognition of our finite capacities. In particular, I am interested in how we can combine the seemingly competing forces of culture and tradition (ways we have been doing things, one might say) with the necessary desire for change, reform, and progress. My approach to these questions can help shape the way we think about the size of states, if and when foreign intervention makes sense, the pace of change, and the necessary variety of political and social orders suited to a varying world.</p><p> The University of Chicago 2017-12-20 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10639185 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy|History|Political science
spellingShingle Philosophy|History|Political science
Rosensweig, Jason
Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
description <p> Explores the foundations of political community as understood in two complementary ways: first, in contemporary normative political and social theory. Second, in the history of politics and in the history of philosophy. Particular attention is given to David Hume, Adam Smith, and Edmund Burke, as well as their relationship to contemporary political philosophers like Bernard Williams, John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Alasdair MacIntyre, Charles Mills. Using Wittgenstein&rsquo;s concept of a form of life <i>(lebensform) </i> in the <i>Philosophical Investigations,</i> argues that there is a family within the history of political thought whose members share the understanding that a shared form of life, which develops organically and historically, is a necessary condition for a free society to work well. Examines how political and social obligation, trust and commerce, as well as sympathy and concepts of rights, all require interdependence and shared assumptions and expectations. This family balances the impulses of political realism and political idealism, though is somewhat more anti-idealist than pro-realist. Bottom-up thinking that doesn&rsquo;t fall in to the trap of idealism or of rationalism, due to a commitment to epistemological limits and the recognition of our finite capacities. In particular, I am interested in how we can combine the seemingly competing forces of culture and tradition (ways we have been doing things, one might say) with the necessary desire for change, reform, and progress. My approach to these questions can help shape the way we think about the size of states, if and when foreign intervention makes sense, the pace of change, and the necessary variety of political and social orders suited to a varying world.</p><p>
author Rosensweig, Jason
author_facet Rosensweig, Jason
author_sort Rosensweig, Jason
title Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
title_short Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
title_full Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
title_fullStr Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
title_full_unstemmed Progress, Forms of Life and the Nature of the Political
title_sort progress, forms of life and the nature of the political
publisher The University of Chicago
publishDate 2017
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10639185
work_keys_str_mv AT rosensweigjason progressformsoflifeandthenatureofthepolitical
_version_ 1718566000740270080