An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery

<p> Recovery is a critical function in backbone networks. The primary function of recovery is to provide connectivity regardless of which layer recovery operates at. Another function of recovery is for all services traversing a failed link to be restored in a way that is consistent with a serv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kroculick, Joseph
Language:EN
Published: Illinois Institute of Technology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10273104
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10273104
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-102731042017-07-07T04:14:27Z An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery Kroculick, Joseph Computer science <p> Recovery is a critical function in backbone networks. The primary function of recovery is to provide connectivity regardless of which layer recovery operates at. Another function of recovery is for all services traversing a failed link to be restored in a way that is consistent with a service user's requirements. These requirements can include the consideration of factors such as (1) the cost of recovery, (2) the amount of traffic restored, and (3) the delay in restoring units of traffic. </p><p> With more options available to recover traffic, providing an integrated recovery solution is necessary. An important force driving the evolution of network devices to transport services such as IP traffic is the layering of network resources. Layering enables networks to increase capacity by extending legacy SONET networks to interface with optical wavelengths. Inconsistent provisioning can prevent service continuity from being achieved during a failure. Continuity of service has been recognized as one key business goal. Furthermore, since recovery can occur at a different time than when it is provisioned, inconsistent provisioning is determined after the fact, with services left unrepaired, repaired unnecessarily at an extra cost, or not repaired fast enough. A network manager can check if recovery is consistent with a global perspective on how traffic should be restored by comparing the provisioning at each device against suitable properties of a formal representation. </p><p> To address this issue an engineering method was developed to detect errors in provisioning automated recovery processes in multilayer and multiprotocol transport networks. This dependability assessment process (DAP) leverages inference techniques provided by Semantic Web technologies in order to detect network-device provisioning errors. Provisioning should be accompanied by methodologies, processes, and activities to ensure that it can be trusted to achieve a desired network state. The DAP takes into account unique constraints in the telecommunications domain including bottom-up evolution of physical layer technologies to provide connectivity, and lack of a universal model of network functionality. This method is applied to assessing the correctness of provisioning decisions for a protection switching application in a transport network in both the spatial and temporal domains.</p> Illinois Institute of Technology 2017-07-06 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10273104 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Computer science
spellingShingle Computer science
Kroculick, Joseph
An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
description <p> Recovery is a critical function in backbone networks. The primary function of recovery is to provide connectivity regardless of which layer recovery operates at. Another function of recovery is for all services traversing a failed link to be restored in a way that is consistent with a service user's requirements. These requirements can include the consideration of factors such as (1) the cost of recovery, (2) the amount of traffic restored, and (3) the delay in restoring units of traffic. </p><p> With more options available to recover traffic, providing an integrated recovery solution is necessary. An important force driving the evolution of network devices to transport services such as IP traffic is the layering of network resources. Layering enables networks to increase capacity by extending legacy SONET networks to interface with optical wavelengths. Inconsistent provisioning can prevent service continuity from being achieved during a failure. Continuity of service has been recognized as one key business goal. Furthermore, since recovery can occur at a different time than when it is provisioned, inconsistent provisioning is determined after the fact, with services left unrepaired, repaired unnecessarily at an extra cost, or not repaired fast enough. A network manager can check if recovery is consistent with a global perspective on how traffic should be restored by comparing the provisioning at each device against suitable properties of a formal representation. </p><p> To address this issue an engineering method was developed to detect errors in provisioning automated recovery processes in multilayer and multiprotocol transport networks. This dependability assessment process (DAP) leverages inference techniques provided by Semantic Web technologies in order to detect network-device provisioning errors. Provisioning should be accompanied by methodologies, processes, and activities to ensure that it can be trusted to achieve a desired network state. The DAP takes into account unique constraints in the telecommunications domain including bottom-up evolution of physical layer technologies to provide connectivity, and lack of a universal model of network functionality. This method is applied to assessing the correctness of provisioning decisions for a protection switching application in a transport network in both the spatial and temporal domains.</p>
author Kroculick, Joseph
author_facet Kroculick, Joseph
author_sort Kroculick, Joseph
title An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
title_short An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
title_full An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
title_fullStr An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
title_full_unstemmed An Automated Engineering Process to Verify the Correct Coordination of Multilayer Recovery
title_sort automated engineering process to verify the correct coordination of multilayer recovery
publisher Illinois Institute of Technology
publishDate 2017
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10273104
work_keys_str_mv AT kroculickjoseph anautomatedengineeringprocesstoverifythecorrectcoordinationofmultilayerrecovery
AT kroculickjoseph automatedengineeringprocesstoverifythecorrectcoordinationofmultilayerrecovery
_version_ 1718492044736856064