The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency

<p> It is generally believed by educators that it is important for students to know basic multiplication facts. When students struggle to retrieve the answers to basic multiplication facts, it can negatively influence their ability to complete more difficult algorithms. There has been a call f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berry, Michael David
Language:EN
Published: Wilkes University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10253222
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10253222
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-102532222017-02-23T16:07:38Z The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency Berry, Michael David Education <p> It is generally believed by educators that it is important for students to know basic multiplication facts. When students struggle to retrieve the answers to basic multiplication facts, it can negatively influence their ability to complete more difficult algorithms. There has been a call from educators to look to technology as a resource to teach this generation of students, claiming they are motivated by and prefer a technology rich learning environment. This quantitative, quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of the Mathletics.com technology on basic multiplication fact fluency in fourth grade students. The treatment group received three weeks of scheduled time using Mathletics.com, while the control group practiced multiplication facts using only traditional methods. To determine the effectiveness of the intervention, a nonequivalent control group design was used. To evaluate multiple dependent variables, MANOVA tests provided answers indicating statistical significance and post hoc tests were applied as needed. Using a multivariate approach with speed and accuracy for the construct of fluency, the results indicated that both groups made gains in the accuracy of their answers (<i>F</i>(2, 25) = 3.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .05; Wilks&rsquo; &lambda;&nbsp;= .79; partial &eegr;<sup>2</sup> = .21). While both groups improved with the speed of response on the posttest, the control group improved significantly more than the treatment group (<i>t</i>(13) = 3.60, <i>p</i> &lt; .025). Although the results did not indicate that technology significantly improved the learning of the treatment group, it could still be considered as a tool for today&rsquo;s student.</p> Wilkes University 2017-02-17 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10253222 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Education
spellingShingle Education
Berry, Michael David
The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
description <p> It is generally believed by educators that it is important for students to know basic multiplication facts. When students struggle to retrieve the answers to basic multiplication facts, it can negatively influence their ability to complete more difficult algorithms. There has been a call from educators to look to technology as a resource to teach this generation of students, claiming they are motivated by and prefer a technology rich learning environment. This quantitative, quasi-experimental study investigated the effect of the Mathletics.com technology on basic multiplication fact fluency in fourth grade students. The treatment group received three weeks of scheduled time using Mathletics.com, while the control group practiced multiplication facts using only traditional methods. To determine the effectiveness of the intervention, a nonequivalent control group design was used. To evaluate multiple dependent variables, MANOVA tests provided answers indicating statistical significance and post hoc tests were applied as needed. Using a multivariate approach with speed and accuracy for the construct of fluency, the results indicated that both groups made gains in the accuracy of their answers (<i>F</i>(2, 25) = 3.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .05; Wilks&rsquo; &lambda;&nbsp;= .79; partial &eegr;<sup>2</sup> = .21). While both groups improved with the speed of response on the posttest, the control group improved significantly more than the treatment group (<i>t</i>(13) = 3.60, <i>p</i> &lt; .025). Although the results did not indicate that technology significantly improved the learning of the treatment group, it could still be considered as a tool for today&rsquo;s student.</p>
author Berry, Michael David
author_facet Berry, Michael David
author_sort Berry, Michael David
title The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
title_short The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
title_full The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
title_fullStr The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of the Mathletics.com Technology on Basic Multiplication Fact Fluency
title_sort effect of the mathletics.com technology on basic multiplication fact fluency
publisher Wilkes University
publishDate 2017
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10253222
work_keys_str_mv AT berrymichaeldavid theeffectofthemathleticscomtechnologyonbasicmultiplicationfactfluency
AT berrymichaeldavid effectofthemathleticscomtechnologyonbasicmultiplicationfactfluency
_version_ 1718416033162723328