Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing
<p> This qualitative research study explored the influence of collaborative analysis of student work (CASW) as professional development on teacher practice, specifically during lessons and on written teacher feedback on student work. Additionally, teachers’ perceptions about the infl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Florida Atlantic University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154942 |
id |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10154942 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-101549422016-09-15T15:58:09Z Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing Shealy, Kristin L. Middle school education|Teacher education|Rhetoric <p> This qualitative research study explored the influence of collaborative analysis of student work (CASW) as professional development on teacher practice, specifically during lessons and on written teacher feedback on student work. Additionally, teachers’ perceptions about the influence of CASW sessions and three 2-week instructional cycles on student writing, including the professional development sessions, lessons, and teacher written feedback, were investigated. Qualitative data were collected including teacher interviews, CASW observations, classroom observations, and document analysis. Findings indicated that teachers felt that CASW influenced their increased awareness of teaching and student learning, and implications for future teaching for the whole group as well as ideas for next steps for individual students emerged. Teachers supported CASW being job-embedded and practical to daily work; they voiced concerns over the time and scheduling facilitating the professional development required. Teachers responded that they felt that CASW helped them question their assessment of student writing, consistency within and across grade levels and subjects, and the appropriate level of difficulty of their curriculum. Teachers expressed their desire to be able to meet with students more regularly to go over their teacher written feedback and felt that CASW may possibly influence student work over time. Two teachers felt that the CASW professional development could have influenced their written feedback; four teachers felt that it did not. Implications for professional development, public policy, and further research are given.</p> Florida Atlantic University 2016-09-10 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154942 EN |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
EN |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Middle school education|Teacher education|Rhetoric |
spellingShingle |
Middle school education|Teacher education|Rhetoric Shealy, Kristin L. Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
description |
<p> This qualitative research study explored the influence of collaborative analysis of student work (CASW) as professional development on teacher practice, specifically during lessons and on written teacher feedback on student work. Additionally, teachers’ perceptions about the influence of CASW sessions and three 2-week instructional cycles on student writing, including the professional development sessions, lessons, and teacher written feedback, were investigated. Qualitative data were collected including teacher interviews, CASW observations, classroom observations, and document analysis. Findings indicated that teachers felt that CASW influenced their increased awareness of teaching and student learning, and implications for future teaching for the whole group as well as ideas for next steps for individual students emerged. Teachers supported CASW being job-embedded and practical to daily work; they voiced concerns over the time and scheduling facilitating the professional development required. Teachers responded that they felt that CASW helped them question their assessment of student writing, consistency within and across grade levels and subjects, and the appropriate level of difficulty of their curriculum. Teachers expressed their desire to be able to meet with students more regularly to go over their teacher written feedback and felt that CASW may possibly influence student work over time. Two teachers felt that the CASW professional development could have influenced their written feedback; four teachers felt that it did not. Implications for professional development, public policy, and further research are given.</p> |
author |
Shealy, Kristin L. |
author_facet |
Shealy, Kristin L. |
author_sort |
Shealy, Kristin L. |
title |
Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
title_short |
Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
title_full |
Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
title_fullStr |
Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
title_sort |
impact of collaborative work analysis professional development on teacher practice and student writing |
publisher |
Florida Atlantic University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10154942 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shealykristinl impactofcollaborativeworkanalysisprofessionaldevelopmentonteacherpracticeandstudentwriting |
_version_ |
1718384219639513088 |