Judgments of scientific quality and their effects on published knowledge and its diffusion
<p> Collaborative efforts like modern scientific research depend on methods to evaluate and absorb participants’ contributions, and at the research frontier this evaluative step is often accomplished through the peer review of grants and manuscripts. With billions of dollars and spac...
Main Author: | Teplitskiy, Mikhail |
---|---|
Language: | EN |
Published: |
The University of Chicago
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10129530 |
Similar Items
-
Community Planning Perspective and Its Role within the Social Policy of the Municipalities
by: Ivana Butoracova Sindleryova, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Health Care Reform and Rural Hospitals: Opportunities and Challenges under the Affordable Care Act
by: Parisian, Esther Elizabeth
Published: (2011) -
Beauty is Precious, Knowledge is Power, and Innovation is Progress: Widely Held Beliefs in Policy Narratives about Oil Spills
by: Mason, Brenda Gale
Published: (2015) -
Race, Ethnicity, and the Great Recession| A National Evaluation of Mortgages and Subprime Lending, 2004-2010
by: O'Neil, Meghan M.
Published: (2018) -
Contributions to the sociology of scientific knowledge
by: Collins, H.
Published: (1981)