The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014

<p> A cornerstone of social work&rsquo;s mission is to advocate for practices that create social justice. This study encourages social workers to broaden their advocacy efforts into the global arena and educate them about Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs) that are fighting for equitab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann
Language:EN
Published: State University of New York at Stony Brook 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10003928
id ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-10003928
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-PROQUEST-oai-pqdtoai.proquest.com-100039282016-01-28T04:04:18Z The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014 DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann Social work <p> A cornerstone of social work&rsquo;s mission is to advocate for practices that create social justice. This study encourages social workers to broaden their advocacy efforts into the global arena and educate them about Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs) that are fighting for equitable globalization policies. This longitudinal case study (2001-2014) explores the public debate surrounding human rights abuses in the cocoa industry. Qualitative framing analysis is employed to explore the stakeholders&rsquo; discourse surrounding both the causes of and solutions to the Worst Forms of Child Labor (WFCL). This study analyzes press releases from human rights activists, the cocoa industry, and the media in order to recount the debate&rsquo;s history. Throughout the campaign, the TANs and cocoa companies conflicted over how to improve the Harkin-Engel Protocol and other policies designed to eradicate the WFCL. This study chronicles the TANs&rsquo; strategies and rhetoric used throughout the campaign against the WFCL. Findings include that intense early movement agitation, the practice of &ldquo;naming and shaming,&rdquo; mobilizing stockholder activists and strong resonant frames led to positive changes in the cocoa industry. This study recounts the cocoa industry&rsquo;s reaction from denial of the problem to eventual acceptance of human rights as a corporate norm. Stakeholders ultimately transcended the conflict caused by contrasting ideological differences and created corporate social responsibility policies. It is essential for varied stakeholders to come together and bridge ideological divides in an effort to solve complex societal issues. This study encourages social workers to advocate for change in prevailing inequitable globalization policies. Social workers can play a vital role in envisioning a just world, and through partnering with advocacy networks, be architects of that world&rsquo;s creation. </p> State University of New York at Stony Brook 2016-01-26 00:00:00.0 thesis http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10003928 EN
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Social work
spellingShingle Social work
DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann
The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
description <p> A cornerstone of social work&rsquo;s mission is to advocate for practices that create social justice. This study encourages social workers to broaden their advocacy efforts into the global arena and educate them about Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs) that are fighting for equitable globalization policies. This longitudinal case study (2001-2014) explores the public debate surrounding human rights abuses in the cocoa industry. Qualitative framing analysis is employed to explore the stakeholders&rsquo; discourse surrounding both the causes of and solutions to the Worst Forms of Child Labor (WFCL). This study analyzes press releases from human rights activists, the cocoa industry, and the media in order to recount the debate&rsquo;s history. Throughout the campaign, the TANs and cocoa companies conflicted over how to improve the Harkin-Engel Protocol and other policies designed to eradicate the WFCL. This study chronicles the TANs&rsquo; strategies and rhetoric used throughout the campaign against the WFCL. Findings include that intense early movement agitation, the practice of &ldquo;naming and shaming,&rdquo; mobilizing stockholder activists and strong resonant frames led to positive changes in the cocoa industry. This study recounts the cocoa industry&rsquo;s reaction from denial of the problem to eventual acceptance of human rights as a corporate norm. Stakeholders ultimately transcended the conflict caused by contrasting ideological differences and created corporate social responsibility policies. It is essential for varied stakeholders to come together and bridge ideological divides in an effort to solve complex societal issues. This study encourages social workers to advocate for change in prevailing inequitable globalization policies. Social workers can play a vital role in envisioning a just world, and through partnering with advocacy networks, be architects of that world&rsquo;s creation. </p>
author DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann
author_facet DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann
author_sort DeLuca-Acconi, Robin Ann
title The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
title_short The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
title_full The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
title_fullStr The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
title_full_unstemmed The Power of Advocacy in Bridging the Ideological Divide| The Campaign for Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility in the Cocoa Industry 2001-2014
title_sort power of advocacy in bridging the ideological divide| the campaign for human rights and corporate responsibility in the cocoa industry 2001-2014
publisher State University of New York at Stony Brook
publishDate 2016
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10003928
work_keys_str_mv AT delucaacconirobinann thepowerofadvocacyinbridgingtheideologicaldividethecampaignforhumanrightsandcorporateresponsibilityinthecocoaindustry20012014
AT delucaacconirobinann powerofadvocacyinbridgingtheideologicaldividethecampaignforhumanrightsandcorporateresponsibilityinthecocoaindustry20012014
_version_ 1718162343244857344