The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sun, Jonghun
Language:English
Published: The Ohio State University / OhioLINK 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1351279308
id ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-osu1351279308
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-osu13512793082021-08-03T06:06:31Z The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume Sun, Jonghun Psychology Estimation Unit Previous research has demonstrated that changes in units can affect judgments and decisions. For example, people interpret quantitative information that is expressed as a larger number of small units as being larger than the same quantity expressed as a smaller number of large units. In related work, estimates of length or distance or the monetary value of goods are sometimes larger when participants use large units rather than small units. In all of this research, however, the focus has been on other phenomena (e.g., anchoring, attribute weighting, consumer behavior) rather than on the underlying relationship between numerical estimates and units. In two studies, we anticipated that participants’ estimates of physical quantities (e.g., the weight of a brick) would be larger when participants used larger units (e.g., pounds) than when they used smaller units (e.g., ounces), because their numerical answers would not be adjusted enough to compensate for differences in units. In Study 1, estimates of items’ length, weight, and volume were larger when made in larger units than when made in smaller units. This “unit effect” remained significant when we adjusted for participants’ incorrect knowledge of unit ratios and when we considered only those participants who knew the correct ratios. In addition, the unit effect was larger when participants were less familiar with the units used to make the estimates. In Study 2, participants estimated weight and volume using either familiar or unfamiliar (fictional) units. The unit effect was significant for unfamiliar units but not for familiar units. Possible mechanisms for these results are discussed and further research hypotheses are presented. 2012-12-18 English text The Ohio State University / OhioLINK http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1351279308 http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1351279308 unrestricted This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
Estimation
Unit
spellingShingle Psychology
Estimation
Unit
Sun, Jonghun
The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
author Sun, Jonghun
author_facet Sun, Jonghun
author_sort Sun, Jonghun
title The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
title_short The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
title_full The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
title_fullStr The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Using Large versus Small Units in Quantitative Estimates of Length, Weight, and Volume
title_sort effect of using large versus small units in quantitative estimates of length, weight, and volume
publisher The Ohio State University / OhioLINK
publishDate 2012
url http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1351279308
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjonghun theeffectofusinglargeversussmallunitsinquantitativeestimatesoflengthweightandvolume
AT sunjonghun effectofusinglargeversussmallunitsinquantitativeestimatesoflengthweightandvolume
_version_ 1719431068766961664