id ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-csu1323968844
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-csu13239688442021-08-03T05:35:19Z Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke Jones, Davon I. Anatomy and Physiology Education Energy Gender Physiology Sports Medicine Rowing Power Output Energy Expenditure Upper Body Lower Body Rowing Stroke Rowing Ergometer Gender Training Purpose: This study examined energy expenditure and power output by the upper and lower body, as well as gender, and training differences, using the Concept II Model E rowing ergometer. It was hypothesized that (1) there will be greater energy expenditure and power output with the lower body as compared to the upper body, (2) there will be a significantly greater upper and lower body energy expenditure and power output for males in the rowing stroke, and (3) there will be a significantly greater lower body energy expenditure and power output for trained rowers. Methods: Subjects included 14 males (7 trained, 7 untrained) and 14 females (7 trained, 7 untrained). Test 1 had participants rowing using the full body; a 1000 meter all out row was performed. Test 2 had the pull-chain from the row handle directly attached to the seat of the Concept II to isolate only lower body rowing input. Rowers then completed a 1000m row using the lower body at the same cadence of the full body row. To determine the contribution of the upper body, the results of test 2 were subtracted from test 1. Power output, energy expenditure, row time, distance per stroke, blood lactate, heart rate, and rate of perceived exertion were recorded. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare upper vs lower body, and independent t-tests were used to analyze gender and training effects. Results: Upper body power output (188.6 ± 60.5) was significantly greater than lower body (60.2 ± 28.5) power output (p=.001). Lower body energy expenditure (5.5 ± 4.5) was significantly greater than upper body (8.5 ± 3.8) energy expenditure (p=.043). There was a significant upper/lower by gender interaction for power, with upper body power output significantly greater in males (p=.018). There was a significant upper/lower by training interaction for both power and energy expenditure, with lower body power output (p=.008) and lower body energy expenditure (p=.021) significantly greater for trained. Conclusion: Upper versus lower body differences show the lower body to be more important in determining better rowing performance. Minor gender differences assume that technique, body composition (i.e. height, lean body mass, etc.), or other factors may be more influential in the rowing stroke. Results also suggest that training is more important than gender in rowing performance. 2011-12-16 English text Cleveland State University / OhioLINK http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1323968844 http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1323968844 unrestricted This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Anatomy and Physiology
Education
Energy
Gender
Physiology
Sports Medicine
Rowing
Power Output
Energy Expenditure
Upper Body
Lower Body
Rowing Stroke
Rowing Ergometer
Gender
Training
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Education
Energy
Gender
Physiology
Sports Medicine
Rowing
Power Output
Energy Expenditure
Upper Body
Lower Body
Rowing Stroke
Rowing Ergometer
Gender
Training
Jones, Davon I.
Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
author Jones, Davon I.
author_facet Jones, Davon I.
author_sort Jones, Davon I.
title Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
title_short Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
title_full Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
title_fullStr Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Upper versus Lower Body Contribution to the Rowing Stroke
title_sort upper versus lower body contribution to the rowing stroke
publisher Cleveland State University / OhioLINK
publishDate 2011
url http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=csu1323968844
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdavoni upperversuslowerbodycontributiontotherowingstroke
_version_ 1719422155759812608