A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gracyk, Tatiana Athena
Language:English
Published: Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1587048784866015
id ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-bgsu1587048784866015
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-OhioLink-oai-etd.ohiolink.edu-bgsu15870487848660152021-08-03T07:14:29Z A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare Gracyk, Tatiana Athena Philosophy Medical Ethics Ethics principlism pluralism healthcare decision making bioethics medical ethics clinical ethics This dissertation puts forth the structured principlist framework, a practicable moral framework for guiding practioners’ thinking in a diverse healthcare setting and grounding accepted healthcare practices and policies. This novel moral framework builds upon on the work of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in Principles of Biomedical Ethics, reorganizing the four primary bioethical principles – respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice – into two necessary and jointly-sufficient conditions for the permissibility of an action: The enabling condition, incorporating the deontic principles of respect for autonomy and justice, requires that a proposed action be authorized by the patient or proxy and adhere to current hospital policies & procedures. The favorability condition, incorporating the consequentialist principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, requires that the proposed action be reasonably expected to promote the health of the patient. In normative terms, the structured principlist framework is best described as a pluralistic framework that contains consequentialist considerations yet maintains deontic constraints. This structured framework was developed in response to several criticisms leveled against Beauchamp and Childress’s traditional principlist framework, ultimately capturing the benefits of bioethical principlism while providing a simplified, more guiding, and less capricious framework than the traditional framework. I argue for the structured principlist framework by demonstrating its usefulness when working through ethical conflicts at the clinical level as well as when formulating healthcare policies. 2020-06-24 English text Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1587048784866015 http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1587048784866015 unrestricted This thesis or dissertation is protected by copyright: all rights reserved. It may not be copied or redistributed beyond the terms of applicable copyright laws.
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy
Medical Ethics
Ethics
principlism
pluralism
healthcare
decision making
bioethics
medical ethics
clinical ethics
spellingShingle Philosophy
Medical Ethics
Ethics
principlism
pluralism
healthcare
decision making
bioethics
medical ethics
clinical ethics
Gracyk, Tatiana Athena
A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
author Gracyk, Tatiana Athena
author_facet Gracyk, Tatiana Athena
author_sort Gracyk, Tatiana Athena
title A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
title_short A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
title_full A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
title_fullStr A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
title_full_unstemmed A Structured Principlist Framework for Decision Making in Healthcare
title_sort structured principlist framework for decision making in healthcare
publisher Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK
publishDate 2020
url http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1587048784866015
work_keys_str_mv AT gracyktatianaathena astructuredprinciplistframeworkfordecisionmakinginhealthcare
AT gracyktatianaathena structuredprinciplistframeworkfordecisionmakinginhealthcare
_version_ 1719456887095689216