Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
Accurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF). Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156 |
id |
ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-31156 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-311562012-07-20T03:13:57ZPredicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sourcesHart, Kevin G.Scanning systems -- EvaluationAccurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF). Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is used in a scanning mode where the source to instrument geometry is dynamic during the observation interval. Three separate procedures were developed to determine the SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source passing under the centerline of a 12.7 cm x 7.62 cm NaI(T1) detector. The procedures were first tested for determining the SECF from a series of static point source measurements generated by the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. These static efficiency values were then used to predict the SECF for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s����� with a one second observation interval. The investigator then used MCNP to directly determine the SECF by simulating a scan of a 10 cm x 10 cm area source for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s�����. Comparison of the MCNP static simulation with the scan simulation showed the accuracy of the SECF prediction procedures to be within ��5%. Experimental results further show the three procedures developed to predict the actual SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source to be accurate to within ��10%. Besides the obvious application to determine an SECF for a given scan speed, this method can be used to determine the maximum detector or source velocity for a desired SECF. These procedures are effective and can likely be extended to determine an instrument specific SECF for a range of source sizes, scan speeds, and instrument observation intervals.Graduation date: 2002Higley, Kathryn A.2012-07-19T16:40:41Z2012-07-19T16:40:41Z2002-04-262002-04-26Thesis/Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Scanning systems -- Evaluation |
spellingShingle |
Scanning systems -- Evaluation Hart, Kevin G. Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
description |
Accurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey
relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF).
Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to
source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is used in a
scanning mode where the source to instrument geometry is dynamic during the
observation interval. Three separate procedures were developed to determine the
SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source passing under the centerline of a 12.7 cm x 7.62
cm NaI(T1) detector. The procedures were first tested for determining the SECF
from a series of static point source measurements generated by the Monte Carlo N-Particle
(MCNP) code. These static efficiency values were then used to predict the
SECF for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s����� with a one second
observation interval. The investigator then used MCNP to directly determine the
SECF by simulating a scan of a 10 cm x 10 cm area source for scan speeds ranging
from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s�����. Comparison of the MCNP static simulation with the
scan simulation showed the accuracy of the SECF prediction procedures to be
within ��5%. Experimental results further show the three procedures developed to
predict the actual SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source to be accurate to within ��10%.
Besides the obvious application to determine an SECF for a given scan speed, this
method can be used to determine the maximum detector or source velocity for a
desired SECF. These procedures are effective and can likely be extended to
determine an instrument specific SECF for a range of source sizes, scan speeds, and
instrument observation intervals. === Graduation date: 2002 |
author2 |
Higley, Kathryn A. |
author_facet |
Higley, Kathryn A. Hart, Kevin G. |
author |
Hart, Kevin G. |
author_sort |
Hart, Kevin G. |
title |
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
title_short |
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
title_full |
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
title_fullStr |
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
title_sort |
predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hartkeving predictinginstrumentdetectionefficiencywhenscanningsmallarearadiationsources |
_version_ |
1716392579028746240 |