Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources

Accurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF). Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hart, Kevin G.
Other Authors: Higley, Kathryn A.
Language:en_US
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156
id ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-31156
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-ORGSU-oai-ir.library.oregonstate.edu-1957-311562012-07-20T03:13:57ZPredicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sourcesHart, Kevin G.Scanning systems -- EvaluationAccurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF). Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is used in a scanning mode where the source to instrument geometry is dynamic during the observation interval. Three separate procedures were developed to determine the SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source passing under the centerline of a 12.7 cm x 7.62 cm NaI(T1) detector. The procedures were first tested for determining the SECF from a series of static point source measurements generated by the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. These static efficiency values were then used to predict the SECF for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s����� with a one second observation interval. The investigator then used MCNP to directly determine the SECF by simulating a scan of a 10 cm x 10 cm area source for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s�����. Comparison of the MCNP static simulation with the scan simulation showed the accuracy of the SECF prediction procedures to be within ��5%. Experimental results further show the three procedures developed to predict the actual SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source to be accurate to within ��10%. Besides the obvious application to determine an SECF for a given scan speed, this method can be used to determine the maximum detector or source velocity for a desired SECF. These procedures are effective and can likely be extended to determine an instrument specific SECF for a range of source sizes, scan speeds, and instrument observation intervals.Graduation date: 2002Higley, Kathryn A.2012-07-19T16:40:41Z2012-07-19T16:40:41Z2002-04-262002-04-26Thesis/Dissertationhttp://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Scanning systems -- Evaluation
spellingShingle Scanning systems -- Evaluation
Hart, Kevin G.
Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
description Accurate quantification of radionuclides detected during a scanning survey relies on an appropriately determined scan efficiency calibration factor (SECF). Traditionally, instrument efficiency was determined from a fixed instrument to source geometry. However, as is often the case, the instrument is used in a scanning mode where the source to instrument geometry is dynamic during the observation interval. Three separate procedures were developed to determine the SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source passing under the centerline of a 12.7 cm x 7.62 cm NaI(T1) detector. The procedures were first tested for determining the SECF from a series of static point source measurements generated by the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code. These static efficiency values were then used to predict the SECF for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s����� with a one second observation interval. The investigator then used MCNP to directly determine the SECF by simulating a scan of a 10 cm x 10 cm area source for scan speeds ranging from 10 cm s����� to 80 cm s�����. Comparison of the MCNP static simulation with the scan simulation showed the accuracy of the SECF prediction procedures to be within ��5%. Experimental results further show the three procedures developed to predict the actual SECF for a 10 cm x 10 cm source to be accurate to within ��10%. Besides the obvious application to determine an SECF for a given scan speed, this method can be used to determine the maximum detector or source velocity for a desired SECF. These procedures are effective and can likely be extended to determine an instrument specific SECF for a range of source sizes, scan speeds, and instrument observation intervals. === Graduation date: 2002
author2 Higley, Kathryn A.
author_facet Higley, Kathryn A.
Hart, Kevin G.
author Hart, Kevin G.
author_sort Hart, Kevin G.
title Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
title_short Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
title_full Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
title_fullStr Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
title_full_unstemmed Predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
title_sort predicting instrument detection efficiency when scanning small area radiation sources
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/1957/31156
work_keys_str_mv AT hartkeving predictinginstrumentdetectionefficiencywhenscanningsmallarearadiationsources
_version_ 1716392579028746240