Efficiency of a direct contact condenser in the presence of the noncondensable gas air compared to a tube and shell condenser

• Main Author: Lebsack, Jonathan M.
• Other Authors: Hackleman, David E.
• Language: en_US
• Published: 2012
• Subjects: Direct Contact Condenser; Noncondensable Gas Air; Condenser Efficiency; Tube and Shell Condenser; Peppermint oil > Processing; Condensers (Vapors and gases)
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/1957/28483

Steam distillation is the traditional method used for the extraction of peppermint oil. This process is able to remove approximately 20% of the oils from the leaves of the plant. It is a very costly and un-sustainable process due to the release of carbon emissions. Solvent free microwave extraction promises yields of up to 65% of the "available" oils from the peppermint at 3% less cost (Velasco 2007). It can also reduce carbon emissions because it will be using electricity as a power source instead of fossil fuels, however not all electric companies use renewable energies. In 2009 a SFME pilot plant was assembled in North Carolina to test the efficiency of the microwave process on a larger than lab scale. Results from the experiments showed that the tube and shell condenser was unable to effectively condense the mint oil. The problem was determined to be the addition of air to the mixture due to the open ends of the microwave. However it was discovered that the spray scrubber after the condenser was able to collect a visible amount of oil. This inspired the design of a direct contact condenser (Pommerenck 2012). The direct contact condenser they designed, built, and tested showed vast improvements in steam capturing efficiency when compared to a tube and shell condenser. However due to the materials used for its construction it could not sustain operating temperatures seen in the microwave pilot plant. Using their design a new direct contact condenser was built using materials that would be able to withstand heavy temperatures. The condenser was constructed out of aluminum and contained stainless steel spray nozzles, both for their non-corrosive properties. Tests were conducted using 8 and 16 nozzles and tested over a range of 20-100% steam by mass. Additional tests were completed using the full 24 nozzles but due to the location of some of the nozzles coolant was lost as an aerosol with no way to quantify the loss. Comparing the data to research completed by Pommerenck et al. on efficiency of a tube and shell condenser used for the mint distillation process found that with increasing amounts of air there is a greater loss of heat transfer. This is believed to be the effects of a boundary layer of the noncondensable fluid, air, which forms along the tube and resists condensation from forming (Seunguim 2006). Pommerenck's tube and shell condenser used a coolant flow rate of 24 L/min while the flow rates tested in this research were 18 L/min and 36 L/min. The direct contact condenser showed a considerable increase in performance even with the smaller flow rate compared to the tube and shell unit, indicating removal of the boundary layer. The efficiency tends to follow the maximum theoretical efficiency while the tube and shell condenser lowers in efficiency. The overall goal of this project is to determine the feasibility of the use of a direct contact condenser for implementation in the solvent free microwave extraction of peppermint oil when air is present. === Graduation date: 2012