Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp

The global energy sector is facing a crisis caused by the increasing demand for energy. Non-renewable energy sources, such as fossil fuels produce greenhouse gases that are largely blamed for climate change. The Kyoto protocol requires industrialised nations to reduce their collective greenhouse gas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kemp, Dian
Published: North-West University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10394/6862
id ndltd-NWUBOLOKA1-oai-dspace.nwu.ac.za-10394-6862
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NWUBOLOKA1-oai-dspace.nwu.ac.za-10394-68622014-04-16T03:56:48ZTechnical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. KempKemp, DianCopper-chloride cycleHydrogenNuclearEvaluationKoper-kloor siklusWaterstofKernEvaluasieThe global energy sector is facing a crisis caused by the increasing demand for energy. Non-renewable energy sources, such as fossil fuels produce greenhouse gases that are largely blamed for climate change. The Kyoto protocol requires industrialised nations to reduce their collective greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen as an alternative fuel can serve as a substitute. Hydrogen production is expensive and the gas is largely derived from fossil fuels by a process that releases large quantities of greenhouse gases. In South Africa work on hydrogen production was first done on the Hybrid Sulphur cycle. The high operating temperature and highly corrosive environment involved in the process makes this cycle difficult to work with. The copper-chloride cycle has a lower operating temperature and uses less corrosive materials, making the cycle potentially more economical. Evaluation of the cycle started with the development of four models: the Base model, the Canadian model (developed in Canada) the Kemp model and the Excess model. The Kemp model has the best overall efficiency of 40.89 %, producing hydrogen at a cost of US$4.48/kg. The model does not however provide the excess steam required for the cycle. The Excess model which is based on the Kemp model does provide the excess steam and produces an overall efficiency of 39 % and hydrogen at a cost of US$4.60/kg. The copper-chloride cycle has an improved efficiency and produces hydrogen at a lower cost when compared to the hybrid sulphur cycle. The final conclusion of this thesis is that the copper-chloride cycle should be investigated further and an expected capital and operational costs estimate should be developed to obtain more accurate figures.Thesis (M.Ing. (Nuclear Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.North-West University2012-07-23T10:15:06Z2012-07-23T10:15:06Z2011Thesishttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/6862
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic Copper-chloride cycle
Hydrogen
Nuclear
Evaluation
Koper-kloor siklus
Waterstof
Kern
Evaluasie
spellingShingle Copper-chloride cycle
Hydrogen
Nuclear
Evaluation
Koper-kloor siklus
Waterstof
Kern
Evaluasie
Kemp, Dian
Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
description The global energy sector is facing a crisis caused by the increasing demand for energy. Non-renewable energy sources, such as fossil fuels produce greenhouse gases that are largely blamed for climate change. The Kyoto protocol requires industrialised nations to reduce their collective greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen as an alternative fuel can serve as a substitute. Hydrogen production is expensive and the gas is largely derived from fossil fuels by a process that releases large quantities of greenhouse gases. In South Africa work on hydrogen production was first done on the Hybrid Sulphur cycle. The high operating temperature and highly corrosive environment involved in the process makes this cycle difficult to work with. The copper-chloride cycle has a lower operating temperature and uses less corrosive materials, making the cycle potentially more economical. Evaluation of the cycle started with the development of four models: the Base model, the Canadian model (developed in Canada) the Kemp model and the Excess model. The Kemp model has the best overall efficiency of 40.89 %, producing hydrogen at a cost of US$4.48/kg. The model does not however provide the excess steam required for the cycle. The Excess model which is based on the Kemp model does provide the excess steam and produces an overall efficiency of 39 % and hydrogen at a cost of US$4.60/kg. The copper-chloride cycle has an improved efficiency and produces hydrogen at a lower cost when compared to the hybrid sulphur cycle. The final conclusion of this thesis is that the copper-chloride cycle should be investigated further and an expected capital and operational costs estimate should be developed to obtain more accurate figures. === Thesis (M.Ing. (Nuclear Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.
author Kemp, Dian
author_facet Kemp, Dian
author_sort Kemp, Dian
title Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
title_short Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
title_full Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
title_fullStr Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
title_full_unstemmed Technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / D. Kemp
title_sort technical evaluation of the copper chloride water splitting cycle / d. kemp
publisher North-West University
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10394/6862
work_keys_str_mv AT kempdian technicalevaluationofthecopperchloridewatersplittingcycledkemp
_version_ 1716665247452889088