Die kind se grondwetlike reg tot basiese onderwys en die verpligting van die staat tot voorsiening van infrastruktuur / Christine Roux

• Main Author: Roux, Christine
• Language: other
• Published: 2014
• Subjects: Constitution; Right to basic education; Equality; Best interest of the child; International instruments; Obligation of the state; Infrastructure; Norms and standards; Grondwet; Reg op basiese onderwys; Gelykheid; Beste belang van die kind; Internasionale instrumente; Verpligting van die staat; Infrastruktuur; Norme en standaarde
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10394/11965

Section 29 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 states that everyone has the right to basic education. This provision must be interpreted in order to determine whether it refers to a period of education, or a certain standard or quality of education that also includes infrastructure. In this dissertation, the scope of the right to basic education and the state’s obligation with regard to infrastructure, are discussed. The dissertation will point out that the right to basic education should also consider the best interests of the child-standard as well as the right to equality. The Constitution provides that everyone has the right to basic education, which implies that there should be no discrimination against any child. In order to determine the scope of section 29 and the duty of the state accordingly, the provisions of international instruments must also be consider. The Convention on the Rights of the Child, the African Children Charter and specifically the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights refer to the obligations of the state in respect to the provision of basic education and infrastructure. The Schools Act provides for the Minister of Basic Education to prescribe minimum norms and standards relating to school infrastructure. The importance of minimum norms and standards for quality education has been investigated with specific reference to libraries, learning material and water and sanitation facilities. Lastly, the lack of an internal limitation clause and the effect of section 36, the general limitation clause, were considered to evaluate the state’s obligation to provide quality education. === LLM (Comparative Child Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014