| Summary: | The aim of this investigation was to establish the influence
of a few cognitive as well as non-cognitive factors on the
choice of subjects and the course of study of the std. 7
pupil.
In order to achieve this objective, first a study of the
literature and then an empirical investigation were done to
establish which independent variables have the greatest influence
on the final subject choice and course of study of
the std. 7 pupil.
It is evident that approximately 20 % of the investigation
group was identified as risky cases as a result of an unrealistic
choice. In consequence of this it has been established
that a significant percentage of std. 7 pupils reveals
a fundamental problem with regard to the choice of subjects
and the course of study.
The analysis of responses point to reluctance and inability
to make choices. This situation is influenced negatively
owing to the insensitivity of std. 7 pupils for the advice
and approval of adults. The aspirations and influence of
parents are minimal seeing that probably most of the std. 7
pupils themselves are the decisive factors when this choice
is made.
The findings of the literature study, with regard to intelligence,
sex, previous achievement, aptitude and interest are
established to a lesser or greater extent as factors that
make a relative contribution with regard to subject choice
and course of study.
Although mathematics was identified as the most important
factor, it became apparent that personality traits and in
particular dimensions of the self-image exercise a decisive
influence on the choice of subject and course of study.
The risky cases revealed self-image- and personality problems
which necessarily lead to unrealistic choice of subject and
course of study of std. 7 pupils. A negative or a poor self-image
can result in insecurity, tension, anxiety, indifference
and indecisiveness. The risky cases predominantly
have a negative self-image which has a considerable influence
on their choice of subject and course of study.
The contribution of vocational guidance programmes is probably
insignificant in respect of the subject choice and course
of study of this group of std. 7 pupils. In accordance with
this investigation the vocational guidance programme• did not
succeed in preparing std. 7 pupils for this significant
choice. === Skripsie (MEd)--PU vir CHO, 1989
|
|---|
