Distinguishing neurotic from prosocial "guilt": evidence for the conceptual distinctiveness of checklist and scenario measures.
Despite decades of empirical research, conclusions regarding the adaptiveness of dispositional guilt remain mixed. While some researchers proclaim guilt to be maladaptive and indicative of neuroticism or even psychopathology, others declare it to be adaptive, promoting positive interpersonal functio...
Published: |
|
---|---|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2047/D20214997 |
Similar Items
-
Empathy, Guilt Proneness, and Gender: Relative Contributions to Prosocial Behaviour
by: Linda Torstveit, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Collective guilt and shame in intergroup relations : the effects of group based guilt and shame on intergroup attitudes and prosocial behaviour
by: Coen, Sharon
Published: (2007) -
The importance of distinguishing illegality from guilt in trials for alleged medical malpractice
by: Manuel Fernando Díaz Brousse
Published: (2012-10-01) -
The effectiveness of neurotics as workers compared to non-neurotics
by: R. H. Brothy, et al.
Published: (1978-11-01) -
Prosocial Orientations: Distinguishing Compassionate Goals From Other Constructs
by: Amy Canevello, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)