Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds

The function of large hindlimb muscles with long fascicles and complicated architecture has been studied in many organisms specialized for terrestrial locomotion. Studies of muscle function, energetics and blood flow have allowed a to more accurate determination of which muscles play an important ro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016144
id ndltd-NEU--neu-609
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description The function of large hindlimb muscles with long fascicles and complicated architecture has been studied in many organisms specialized for terrestrial locomotion. Studies of muscle function, energetics and blood flow have allowed a to more accurate determination of which muscles play an important roles during running. One muscle that has been hypothesized to play such a role in birds is the Iliotibialis Lateralis pars Post Acetabularis (ILPO). The ILPO is a large muscle in the hindlimb of cursorial birds, receives a large proportion of the blood flow during running at high speeds, and tends to be reduced or lost in birds that do not employ walking or running as their primary form of locomotion. One of the goals of this study was to comprehensively characterize the function of the ILPO, taking into account the ILPO's long fascicles that vary in length, the muscle's complex origin and insertion, and its anatomical variations seen across different bird orders. In order to characterize the ILPO's function during running, length changes and electrical activity were measured along the posterior fascicle of the ILPO and between the anterior and posterior fascicle of the ILPO in the Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris). These results were compared to those predicted by a moment arm and kinematics model developed in the guinea fowl. To determine how the ILPO functions during other types of locomotion in species that are not specialized for cursorial locomotion, the function of the ILPO was measured during swimming and running in the Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), a bird that employs both swimming and terrestrial forms of locomotion, and the Mallard (Anas platyrhynchus), a bird that - while capable of terrestrial locomotion - locomotes primarily via surface swimming. Finally, the function of another muscle was measured in the mallard that, based on blood flow and anatomical studies, appears to play an important role during swimming, the Flexor Cruris Lateralis (FCL). The FCL, like the ILPO, is a large muscle with a complex origin and insertion in cursorial locomotors. However unlike the ILPO this muscle does not appear to be reduced or absent in birds that locomote via swimming: instead it appears to have been significantly modified in birds that employ swimming as a primary form of locomotion. Our results demonstrate that, when active, the ILPO in the guinea fowl experiences similar amounts of length change and has the same average velocity during active lengthening and active shortening between fascicles. It is hypothesized that the varying moment arm at the hip as well as the tendinous aponeurosis play a role in maintaining a uniform amount of active strain among fascicles of different lengths. Along a fascicle, the strain in the ILPO was uniform in the different segments of the posterior ILPO during the active shortening part of the length change cycle and differential strain was found to occur between proximal, central and distal segments during active lengthening, passive lengthening and passive shortening. These proximal to distal differences may be caused by different amounts of length change when the ILPO is being passively shortened followed by compensatory length-tension effects during the period when the ILPO is being actively lengthened. In the common moorhen and mallard, the ILPO's function during terrestrial locomotion appears to be relatively conserved and a similar strain pattern during cursorial locomotion is observed in all three species. Although the ILPO is active during swimming in both the mallard and the common moorhen, our results suggest that the ILPO does not play a large functional role during swimming in either species. Our results show that although the ILPO is active in the common moorhen during swimming, it experiences less strain than it does during running. Our measurements of ILPO function in a swimming mallard show that there is a significant decrease in both strain and electrical activity. Finally, there is no significant effect of speed on emg activity of the ILPO during swimming in either the common moorhen or mallard, indicating that although the limb as a whole must produce more work to go faster, it is not producing the extra work needed using the ILPO in either species of swimming birds. Based on our results, the FCL of the mallard appears to function in both terrestrial locomotion and during swimming. During running, the FCL actively shortens during the stance phase, producing positive work which likely counteracts cocontracting knee extensors and driving knee flexion. During swimming the FCL is actively lengthened, and later isometric, for a large portion of the swim cycle. When the FCL is isometric it is possible that the FCL is holding the knee and hip in a flexed position and decreasing the amount of drag on the mallard by increasing the streamlined appearance of the body. This research demonstrates how muscles can function in different types of locomotion and in different species during the same type of locomotion. The variations observed within the ILPO and the FCL in terms of both structure and function demonstrates the importance of muscles functioning to produce positive work and demonstrates how muscles play an important role in stability during both swimming and running either by remaining isometric or by being lengthened while active.
title Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
spellingShingle Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
title_short Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
title_full Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
title_fullStr Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
title_full_unstemmed Muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
title_sort muscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birds
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016144
_version_ 1719406360860295168
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-6092021-05-26T05:10:22ZMuscle function during swimming and running in aquatic, semi-aquatic and cursorial birdsThe function of large hindlimb muscles with long fascicles and complicated architecture has been studied in many organisms specialized for terrestrial locomotion. Studies of muscle function, energetics and blood flow have allowed a to more accurate determination of which muscles play an important roles during running. One muscle that has been hypothesized to play such a role in birds is the Iliotibialis Lateralis pars Post Acetabularis (ILPO). The ILPO is a large muscle in the hindlimb of cursorial birds, receives a large proportion of the blood flow during running at high speeds, and tends to be reduced or lost in birds that do not employ walking or running as their primary form of locomotion. One of the goals of this study was to comprehensively characterize the function of the ILPO, taking into account the ILPO's long fascicles that vary in length, the muscle's complex origin and insertion, and its anatomical variations seen across different bird orders. In order to characterize the ILPO's function during running, length changes and electrical activity were measured along the posterior fascicle of the ILPO and between the anterior and posterior fascicle of the ILPO in the Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris). These results were compared to those predicted by a moment arm and kinematics model developed in the guinea fowl. To determine how the ILPO functions during other types of locomotion in species that are not specialized for cursorial locomotion, the function of the ILPO was measured during swimming and running in the Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus), a bird that employs both swimming and terrestrial forms of locomotion, and the Mallard (Anas platyrhynchus), a bird that - while capable of terrestrial locomotion - locomotes primarily via surface swimming. Finally, the function of another muscle was measured in the mallard that, based on blood flow and anatomical studies, appears to play an important role during swimming, the Flexor Cruris Lateralis (FCL). The FCL, like the ILPO, is a large muscle with a complex origin and insertion in cursorial locomotors. However unlike the ILPO this muscle does not appear to be reduced or absent in birds that locomote via swimming: instead it appears to have been significantly modified in birds that employ swimming as a primary form of locomotion. Our results demonstrate that, when active, the ILPO in the guinea fowl experiences similar amounts of length change and has the same average velocity during active lengthening and active shortening between fascicles. It is hypothesized that the varying moment arm at the hip as well as the tendinous aponeurosis play a role in maintaining a uniform amount of active strain among fascicles of different lengths. Along a fascicle, the strain in the ILPO was uniform in the different segments of the posterior ILPO during the active shortening part of the length change cycle and differential strain was found to occur between proximal, central and distal segments during active lengthening, passive lengthening and passive shortening. These proximal to distal differences may be caused by different amounts of length change when the ILPO is being passively shortened followed by compensatory length-tension effects during the period when the ILPO is being actively lengthened. In the common moorhen and mallard, the ILPO's function during terrestrial locomotion appears to be relatively conserved and a similar strain pattern during cursorial locomotion is observed in all three species. Although the ILPO is active during swimming in both the mallard and the common moorhen, our results suggest that the ILPO does not play a large functional role during swimming in either species. Our results show that although the ILPO is active in the common moorhen during swimming, it experiences less strain than it does during running. Our measurements of ILPO function in a swimming mallard show that there is a significant decrease in both strain and electrical activity. Finally, there is no significant effect of speed on emg activity of the ILPO during swimming in either the common moorhen or mallard, indicating that although the limb as a whole must produce more work to go faster, it is not producing the extra work needed using the ILPO in either species of swimming birds. Based on our results, the FCL of the mallard appears to function in both terrestrial locomotion and during swimming. During running, the FCL actively shortens during the stance phase, producing positive work which likely counteracts cocontracting knee extensors and driving knee flexion. During swimming the FCL is actively lengthened, and later isometric, for a large portion of the swim cycle. When the FCL is isometric it is possible that the FCL is holding the knee and hip in a flexed position and decreasing the amount of drag on the mallard by increasing the streamlined appearance of the body. This research demonstrates how muscles can function in different types of locomotion and in different species during the same type of locomotion. The variations observed within the ILPO and the FCL in terms of both structure and function demonstrates the importance of muscles functioning to produce positive work and demonstrates how muscles play an important role in stability during both swimming and running either by remaining isometric or by being lengthened while active.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d10016144