Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.

Social praise is generally considered to be a conditioned reinforcer. However, many children with developmental disabilities do not respond to social stimuli as a typically developing child would. The present study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) to establish 2 social consequences, back p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001171
id ndltd-NEU--neu-541
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-5412021-05-26T05:10:17ZDetermining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.Social praise is generally considered to be a conditioned reinforcer. However, many children with developmental disabilities do not respond to social stimuli as a typically developing child would. The present study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) to establish 2 social consequences, back pats and verbal praise, as conditioned reinforcers for a 3-year-old boy with autism. Both a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure and an SD procedure were evaluated. In the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure, the delivery of the social stimulus was immediately followed by the delivery of the primary reinforcer. In the SD procedure, the social stimulus was established as a discriminative stimulus for the primary reinforcer. The results indicated that neither the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure nor the SD procedure effectively conditioned the social stimuli as reinforcers.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001171
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Social praise is generally considered to be a conditioned reinforcer. However, many children with developmental disabilities do not respond to social stimuli as a typically developing child would. The present study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) to establish 2 social consequences, back pats and verbal praise, as conditioned reinforcers for a 3-year-old boy with autism. Both a stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure and an SD procedure were evaluated. In the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure, the delivery of the social stimulus was immediately followed by the delivery of the primary reinforcer. In the SD procedure, the social stimulus was established as a discriminative stimulus for the primary reinforcer. The results indicated that neither the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure nor the SD procedure effectively conditioned the social stimuli as reinforcers.
title Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
spellingShingle Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_short Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_full Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_fullStr Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_full_unstemmed Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_sort determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001171
_version_ 1719406336360316928