Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation

The purpose of this study was to examine IJA [Initiating Joint Attention] scores of 34 children with autism [CWA] and 34 typically developing children [TDC] during and after toy activation. Composite scores summarized performance of three behaviors (gestures, eye contact, and vocalizations) across t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001095
id ndltd-NEU--neu-537
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-5372021-05-26T05:10:17ZImproving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activationThe purpose of this study was to examine IJA [Initiating Joint Attention] scores of 34 children with autism [CWA] and 34 typically developing children [TDC] during and after toy activation. Composite scores summarized performance of three behaviors (gestures, eye contact, and vocalizations) across toys. Performance was evaluated during toy activation only, and two seconds and five seconds after activation. Results of the analysis indicated that for 13 out of 34 CWA and 13 out of 34 TDC, joint attention occurred within two seconds after the activation period. When observations included five seconds after the toy stopped, joint attention occurred for 22 of 34 CWA and 19 of 34 TDC. Extending the observation period after toy activation from 2-s to 5-s resulted in the number of joint attention initiations increasing. To obtain the most accurate assessment of joint attention behavior, observation and scoring should continue until five seconds after the activation period.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001095
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description The purpose of this study was to examine IJA [Initiating Joint Attention] scores of 34 children with autism [CWA] and 34 typically developing children [TDC] during and after toy activation. Composite scores summarized performance of three behaviors (gestures, eye contact, and vocalizations) across toys. Performance was evaluated during toy activation only, and two seconds and five seconds after activation. Results of the analysis indicated that for 13 out of 34 CWA and 13 out of 34 TDC, joint attention occurred within two seconds after the activation period. When observations included five seconds after the toy stopped, joint attention occurred for 22 of 34 CWA and 19 of 34 TDC. Extending the observation period after toy activation from 2-s to 5-s resulted in the number of joint attention initiations increasing. To obtain the most accurate assessment of joint attention behavior, observation and scoring should continue until five seconds after the activation period.
title Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
spellingShingle Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
title_short Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
title_full Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
title_fullStr Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
title_full_unstemmed Improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
title_sort improving accuracy of joint attention assessment by extending the observation period after toy activation
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20001095
_version_ 1719406335013945344