Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.

Social consequences, such as praise, do not function as reinforcers for many individuals with autism. The current study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) in order to condition 2 social stimuli, verbal praise and thumbs up, as reinforcers for a 3-year-old boy with autism. Two procedures, sti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000288
id ndltd-NEU--neu-498
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-4982021-05-26T05:10:14ZDetermining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.Social consequences, such as praise, do not function as reinforcers for many individuals with autism. The current study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) in order to condition 2 social stimuli, verbal praise and thumbs up, as reinforcers for a 3-year-old boy with autism. Two procedures, stimulus-stimulus pairing and a discriminative stimulus procedure, were evaluated. The stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure involved delivering the to-be-conditioned stimulus and immediately following it with a known reinforcer. The discriminative stimulus procedure involved establishing the to-be-conditioned stimulus as discriminative for a response that produced the same known reinforcer. Results indicated that the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure was ineffective, while the discriminative stimulus procedure effectively conditioned both social stimuli as reinforcers.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000288
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Social consequences, such as praise, do not function as reinforcers for many individuals with autism. The current study replicated the procedures of Gibson (2009) in order to condition 2 social stimuli, verbal praise and thumbs up, as reinforcers for a 3-year-old boy with autism. Two procedures, stimulus-stimulus pairing and a discriminative stimulus procedure, were evaluated. The stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure involved delivering the to-be-conditioned stimulus and immediately following it with a known reinforcer. The discriminative stimulus procedure involved establishing the to-be-conditioned stimulus as discriminative for a response that produced the same known reinforcer. Results indicated that the stimulus-stimulus pairing procedure was ineffective, while the discriminative stimulus procedure effectively conditioned both social stimuli as reinforcers.
title Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
spellingShingle Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_short Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_full Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_fullStr Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_full_unstemmed Determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
title_sort determining the reinforcing value of social consequences and establishing social consequences as reinforcers: a replication.
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000288
_version_ 1719406321081516032