First principles
This commentary responds to Professor Frederick Schauer’s article, Constitutional Positivism, which appears earlier in this issue of the Connecticut Law Review.
Published: |
|
---|---|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002566 |
id |
ndltd-NEU--neu-332608 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-NEU--neu-3326082016-04-25T16:15:00ZFirst principlesThis commentary responds to Professor Frederick Schauer’s article, Constitutional Positivism, which appears earlier in this issue of the Connecticut Law Review.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002566 |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
This commentary responds to Professor Frederick Schauer’s article, Constitutional Positivism, which appears earlier in this issue of the Connecticut Law Review. |
title |
First principles |
spellingShingle |
First principles |
title_short |
First principles |
title_full |
First principles |
title_fullStr |
First principles |
title_full_unstemmed |
First principles |
title_sort |
first principles |
publishDate |
|
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002566 |
_version_ |
1718235864198283264 |