Teaching Local 1330

In the Steelworkers Local 1330 v. U. S. Steel Corporation case, workers attempted to prevent or delay the company’s planned shutdown of a steel plant inYoungstown,Ohio, so that the employees could purchase the plant and keep it in operation. Their effort was unsuccessful, and the plant-closure did o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002528
id ndltd-NEU--neu-332542
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-3325422016-04-25T16:14:59ZTeaching Local 1330In the Steelworkers Local 1330 v. U. S. Steel Corporation case, workers attempted to prevent or delay the company’s planned shutdown of a steel plant inYoungstown,Ohio, so that the employees could purchase the plant and keep it in operation. Their effort was unsuccessful, and the plant-closure did occur causing widespread human suffering and economic deterioration inYoungstown and its environs. The case remains of great legal interest because of the workers’ exceptionally creative and thoughtful legal claims. These include the assertion, rejected by the court, that the workers and/or surrounding community acquired a property interest in the plant by virtue of their investment of human capital, labor, and other resources. An unintended, low-visibility legacy of the steelworkers’ struggle was its contribution to progressive legal education. In this article, a law professor discusses a classroom exercise based on the case he developed with the goals of empowering law students, demystifying mainstream legal discourses, and enhancing students’ capacities to develop imaginative legal theories in service to social justice. The article also explores the goals and underlying values of critical legal pedagogy.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002528
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description In the Steelworkers Local 1330 v. U. S. Steel Corporation case, workers attempted to prevent or delay the company’s planned shutdown of a steel plant inYoungstown,Ohio, so that the employees could purchase the plant and keep it in operation. Their effort was unsuccessful, and the plant-closure did occur causing widespread human suffering and economic deterioration inYoungstown and its environs. The case remains of great legal interest because of the workers’ exceptionally creative and thoughtful legal claims. These include the assertion, rejected by the court, that the workers and/or surrounding community acquired a property interest in the plant by virtue of their investment of human capital, labor, and other resources. An unintended, low-visibility legacy of the steelworkers’ struggle was its contribution to progressive legal education. In this article, a law professor discusses a classroom exercise based on the case he developed with the goals of empowering law students, demystifying mainstream legal discourses, and enhancing students’ capacities to develop imaginative legal theories in service to social justice. The article also explores the goals and underlying values of critical legal pedagogy.
title Teaching Local 1330
spellingShingle Teaching Local 1330
title_short Teaching Local 1330
title_full Teaching Local 1330
title_fullStr Teaching Local 1330
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Local 1330
title_sort teaching local 1330
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002528
_version_ 1718235857114103808