id |
ndltd-NEU--neu-332410
|
record_format |
oai_dc
|
spelling |
ndltd-NEU--neu-3324102016-04-25T16:14:56Zlimitations of transsubstantive procedureIn this Essay, I explain both the nineteenth and twentieth century decisions to adopt transsubstantive procedure, borrowing from equity as the model. I then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the transsubstantive/equity decision, and why, on balance, I think the combined decision needs readjustment. I end with suggestions for change, including a simpler procedural track for some cases and non-binding protocols for discovery and other procedural incidents for some of the more expansive and expensive case-types.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002470
|
collection |
NDLTD
|
sources |
NDLTD
|
description |
In this Essay, I explain both the nineteenth and twentieth century decisions to adopt transsubstantive procedure, borrowing from equity as the model. I then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the transsubstantive/equity decision, and why, on balance, I think the combined decision needs readjustment. I end with suggestions for change, including a simpler procedural track for some cases and non-binding protocols for discovery and other procedural incidents for some of the more expansive and expensive case-types.
|
title |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
spellingShingle |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
title_short |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
title_full |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
title_fullStr |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
title_full_unstemmed |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
title_sort |
limitations of transsubstantive procedure
|
publishDate |
|
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002470
|
_version_ |
1718235843212083200
|