distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts

This study addresses the hypothesis that the more accurately a speaker discriminates a vowel contrast, the more distinctly the speaker produces that contrast. Measures of speech production and perception were collected from 19 young adult speakers of American English. In the production experiment, s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000866
id ndltd-NEU--neu-332278
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-NEU--neu-3322782016-04-25T16:14:53Zdistinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrastsThis study addresses the hypothesis that the more accurately a speaker discriminates a vowel contrast, the more distinctly the speaker produces that contrast. Measures of speech production and perception were collected from 19 young adult speakers of American English. In the production experiment, speakers repeated the words cod, cud, who’d, and hood in a carrier phrase at normal, clear, and fast rates. Articulatory movements and the associated acoustic signal were recorded, yielding measures of contrast distance between /a/ and /ʌ/ and between /u/ and /ʊ/. In the discrimination experiment, sets of seven natural-sounding stimuli ranging from cod to cud and who’d to hood were synthesized, based on productions by one male and one female speaker. The continua were then presented to each of the 19 speakers in labeling and discrimination tasks. Consistent with the hypothesis, speakers with discrimination scores above the median produced greater acoustic contrasts than speakers with discrimination scores at or below the median. Such a relation between speech production and perception is compatible with a model of speech production in which articulatory movements for vowels are planned primarily in auditory space.http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000866
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description This study addresses the hypothesis that the more accurately a speaker discriminates a vowel contrast, the more distinctly the speaker produces that contrast. Measures of speech production and perception were collected from 19 young adult speakers of American English. In the production experiment, speakers repeated the words cod, cud, who’d, and hood in a carrier phrase at normal, clear, and fast rates. Articulatory movements and the associated acoustic signal were recorded, yielding measures of contrast distance between /a/ and /ʌ/ and between /u/ and /ʊ/. In the discrimination experiment, sets of seven natural-sounding stimuli ranging from cod to cud and who’d to hood were synthesized, based on productions by one male and one female speaker. The continua were then presented to each of the 19 speakers in labeling and discrimination tasks. Consistent with the hypothesis, speakers with discrimination scores above the median produced greater acoustic contrasts than speakers with discrimination scores at or below the median. Such a relation between speech production and perception is compatible with a model of speech production in which articulatory movements for vowels are planned primarily in auditory space.
title distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
spellingShingle distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
title_short distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
title_full distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
title_fullStr distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
title_full_unstemmed distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
title_sort distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts
publishDate
url http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20000866
_version_ 1718235829209399296